SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
coastal caribbean (cco@)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4686 30 0 COCBE
Emcee:  jacob deutschmann Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4211Ed: I do not understand it all, either! I did not mention the point you are talkwill3-5/14/2004
4210I did read everything, but I can't say I understand it all. I interpreted thEdwin S. Fujinaka-5/14/2004
4209Ed, have you read the Writ for Certiorari that Coastal submitted to the US Suprewill3-5/13/2004
4208If the Company does not go bankrupt and either sell or default on the leases, soEdwin S. Fujinaka-5/13/2004
4207What's your point?? No one is going to allow drilling, so these "assetHoward C.-5/13/2004
4206Oops, I slipped a decimal in my calculations and the result should have been to Edwin S. Fujinaka-5/13/2004
4205St George Island Site alone worth over $15/share to COCBF shareholders: Just toEdwin S. Fujinaka-5/10/2004
4204Howard: I was waiting to see if anyone posted any interesting information... Thwill3-5/10/2004
4203Come on, up 118% - anybody know anything? Is Sandra Day O'conner buying stoHoward C.-5/10/2004
4202Whoah, we are up 74%, that's worth a post, don't you think? Any clues? Howard C.-5/10/2004
4201Howard: No, that does not mean the Supremes will hear the case; all it means iswill3-5/7/2004
4200Does that mean the Supreme Court WILL hear the case, or still considering hearinHoward C.-5/7/2004
4199For those interested... Here is the info contained in the docket... Note that FLwill3-5/6/2004
4198I get it... Thanks for the other web site... BTW, we are on the docket! Newer2 will3-5/6/2004
4197I meant ramblings on topics only marginally related to our case. I'm just aHoward C.-5/6/2004
4196What "aimless ramblings" are you referring to? Ed's? The Supreme Cwill3-5/6/2004
4195Do these aimless ramblings mean that the Supreme Court did not jump on our case Howard C.-5/5/2004
4194Ted Turner, 'Environmentalist' Driller newsmax.com Thursday, April 29,Edwin S. Fujinaka-5/1/2004
4193Adios, cheap oil, bring on the big bucks atimes.com atimes.com Global EconomyEdwin S. Fujinaka-4/30/2004
4192Courts protect mining rights for IMC. heraldtribune.com This is a printer frieEdwin S. Fujinaka-4/28/2004
4191Restricting production? It's always the supply side with you fellows. EverHoward C.-4/14/2004
4190The editorial on how the Democrats should usually get the credit for restrictingEdwin S. Fujinaka-4/14/2004
4189Don't make me throw up. As soon as Cheney obeys orders from several governmHoward C.-4/13/2004
4188Well, if I do not gain anything financially from this at least I have gained somwill3-4/13/2004
4187Dems block oil-drilling jobs in U.S. sltrib.com --------------------------------Edwin S. Fujinaka-4/12/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):