SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
42185kirk said: <<You are lying and you know it. Comparing Brinker's advioctavian41/15/2009
42184hahahaha, exactly right!Web$urf-1/15/2009
42183I did some buying today using profit taking dollars from when the markets were mKirk ©11/15/2009
42182Kirk: "When I trail the market you say I am a failure then when I beat it,dick_from_chgoo41/15/2009
42181<b>THIS IS PRICELESS !</b> ________________________________________EQ 31/15/2009
42180Grow up... When I trailed the market you say I am a failure then when I beat itKirk ©-1/15/2009
42179> ROTL. She loves being in control, doesn't she. Well put. If she onlEQ 31/15/2009
42178> I will be doing most of my Silicon Investor posting here from now on: ProbEQ 31/15/2009
42177Well, I see freespeechhoney has complained to Admin. Dave again and had some of EQ 21/15/2009
42176kirk: "My explore portfolio beat the market in 2008 and is ahead so far indick_from_chgoo41/15/2009
42175ROTL. She loves being in control, doesn't she.Midwest_Investor41/15/2009
42174Murray says trying to time the market becomes the ultimate fool's errand: ItKirk ©-1/15/2009
42173That is a lie not even worth addressing. I've recommended a core portfolio aKirk ©-1/15/2009
42172<b>"...Now if you are happy getting benchmarks rather than chasing thgronieel41/15/2009
42171>>>you and your fake friend here have lied by saying following my advicMidwest_Investor41/15/2009
42170Math Junkie, read here for an analysis that makes the following assertions backSkeeter Bug11/15/2009
42169uh... <I>(See 42149)</i> That takes me to my post Message 25323829Kirk ©-1/14/2009
42168<I>Remember, this discussion arose out of someone saying that riding out 5Kirk ©-1/14/2009
42167I will be doing most of my Silicon Investor posting here from now on: Subject 5Honey_Bee-1/14/2009
42166"<i>ignoring the effect of the QQQ in your analysis makes it BS or spMath Junkie21/14/2009
42165Skeeter, my question was specific. Your answers have not been. I asked "WMath Junkie21/14/2009
42164I didn't see any mention or adjustment for the 30% loss unaccounted for in PKirk ©-1/14/2009
42163"<i>Your evaluation method is as poor as Dilbert's which ignores Math Junkie21/14/2009
42162octavian, the overall market had been way over valued, too. not the 10,000% likSkeeter Bug-1/14/2009
42161Marketlover, I am responding to this post only to point it out to you the post Honey_Bee11/14/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News