SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Star Technology STRR
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
872 1 0 STRR
Emcee:  Arthur Tang Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
422 John, still looks neutral for short term trading - intermediate and long term TradeOfTheDay-12/24/1997
421 John, Why spoil "Comedy Central" with a legitimate STRR question. PleTed Downs-12/24/1997
420 John, Biggest unknown here is where does tax loss selling stand. It may have dwight vickers-12/24/1997
419 So, would you guys consider this a good place to buy back in? I have just beenJohn Covalesky-12/24/1997
418 Artie, You seem to misunderstand what is considered content on these boards. dwight vickers-12/24/1997
417 Right, your way with words and cleverness makes you quite an opponent. Name cadwight vickers-12/24/1997
416 You may be posting but you have no content to discuss.Arthur Tang-12/24/1997
415 You just got back what you wrote. That's why you are dimwitt.Arthur Tang-12/24/1997
414 Bev and John, That would be my guess, also. Everytime it tries to run up somedwight vickers-12/23/1997
413 Somehow I don't think he " got it "..... back to the subject at TradeOfTheDay-12/23/1997
412 *NE* BTW, To make sure that those who are easily confused are not... my prevJohn Covalesky-12/23/1997
411 I have not seen/heard anything that would explain the rise... i was hoping someJohn Covalesky-12/23/1997
410 Strr investors, we have a little bump in price. Volume has been increasing theRobert Marzullo-12/23/1997
409 I wrote my initial post suggesting that we SHOULD get back to relevant discussiJohn Covalesky-12/23/1997
408 Artie, Read the last sentence in your post. Then go back and count the times dwight vickers-12/23/1997
407 Artie, I guess calling other posters "stupid" and "moron" dwight vickers-12/23/1997
406 You can get on AOL and others to have some fun. But here we want to have the suArthur Tang-12/23/1997
405 You are the only one who is the dimwitt. Personal attacks are not allowed by thArthur Tang-12/23/1997
404 Well... my last reply might have seemed a tad dimwitted to ya Mr. Tang, but I jJohn Covalesky-12/23/1997
403 Artie, "People"? What, do you have a mouse in your pocket? Seems ldwight vickers-12/23/1997
402 If you look up STRR and write some thing about it, then people will tolerate yoArthur Tang-12/23/1997
401 Your cleverness and command of the English language are obviously without peer.dwight vickers-12/22/1997
400 But not a dimwitt?Arthur Tang-12/22/1997
399 Right Artie, everyone else is a moron and a jerk. Never does quite sink in, dodwight vickers-12/22/1997
398 offended, not at all. When you send me email, I responded in kind, politely. BuArthur Tang-12/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News