SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
HWP -- Hewlett Packard
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4722 63 0 HPQ
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4240I suspect Walter Hewlett has more at stake as a shareholder than most of the othCharles Tutt-3/5/2002
4239>>>Compaq-HP Opposition<<< The tail does not way the dog. TheJerome-3/5/2002
4238<B>Poll Finds More Compaq-HP Opposition</b> biz.yahoo.com Excerpt: Kirk ©-3/5/2002
4237Re: mergers. I seen more than my share of moderate and large mergers in ten pluWilliam Partmann-3/5/2002
4236Bob, This company is starting to scare me. My position is not large but I am afDavid Kelly-3/4/2002
4235David, you asked about "a better pop". That, to me, implies that you&#Oeconomicus-3/4/2002
4234O.T. - Gee, that sounds exactly like the car I used to own. I wonder . . .Starlight-3/4/2002
4233There are lots of tea leaves out there.... Here is how I see it.... Merger votJerome-3/4/2002
4232I would say disapproval would be better for HWP, but I'm sure you'll heaCharles Tutt-3/4/2002
4231I disagree completely. Walter Hewlett seems to me to be the one acting sincerelCharles Tutt-3/4/2002
4230What vote will provide a better "pop" for this stock, approval or disaDavid Kelly-3/4/2002
4229>>>THAT is gone...Poof... as it comes from the top and the top would raJerome-3/4/2002
4228good post remember the "good old days" when HP didn't bash the coKirk ©-3/4/2002
4227What is funny about the pro-merger faction is their need to demonize Walter. WaWilliam Partmann-3/4/2002
4226Maybe Charles,, but my money is on Wierd Wally being an instigator of the mess. Captain Jack-3/3/2002
4225I think they probably would have identified Hewlett if he was involved. I wondeCharles Tutt-3/3/2002
4224More of Wally BS?? I'd bet... now maybe cpq will get back into my 'buy&#Captain Jack-3/3/2002
4223<i>HWP at 25 a share by the end of March.</i> Which year? <G>Dave B-3/1/2002
422222 million shares on CPQ today, including 11 million shares in the first hour anJerome-3/1/2002
4221None of the above. The answer is either arbs hedging their HWP short positions aOeconomicus-3/1/2002
4220From the CPQ board... To:Windseye who wrote (95586) From: Jerome Friday, Mar 1Jerome-3/1/2002
4219She probably thinks she's in line for one of the retention bonuses. Either Oeconomicus-3/1/2002
4218Met my first pro-merger HP employee last night (out of 40 or so that I've taDave B-3/1/2002
4217OT *** Good Old Days and Rusted American Wheels..*** Did you ever drop cherry bJerome-2/28/2002
4216OT: corvair.org 62 SPYDER COUPE (2/25/02) DESCRIPTION: Nice original Calif caOeconomicus-2/28/2002
4215*** OT Corvairs*** I have always wanted to restore a Corvair Spyder, but those Jerome-2/28/2002
4214OT I still remember watching the road go by through the holes in the floor of oCharles Tutt-2/28/2002
4213Kirk, <i>I must admit I've held my proxy vote as I want to hear what Dave B-2/28/2002
4212<I>HWP's Carly laid out a well itemized plan for the future. Its not aKirk ©-2/28/2002
4211And you still believe the analysts? Have you learned nothing?William Partmann-2/28/2002
4210<i>Do you still own a Corvair?</i> It may be unsafe at any speed, bOeconomicus-2/28/2002
4209HWP's Carly laid out a well itemized plan for the future. Its not a wild assJerome-2/28/2002
4208>>>you can't study the future because it has happened yet<<&lJerome-2/28/2002
4207Jerome, you can't study the future because it has happened yet. If you'William Partmann-2/28/2002
4206Kirk, study history all you want..its the future that counts.From the CPQ threadJerome-2/28/2002
4205Return on equity looks good, too. Funny, CPQ is the only one of the four with a Oeconomicus-2/27/2002
4204Look at 3, 5 and 10 yr return on assets. quicken.com You want to beat CDs... HWKirk ©-2/27/2002
4203Jerome, you left out this comparison. 5-Yr avg Net margin: HWP 5.9% CPQ -.2%Oeconomicus-2/27/2002
4202Jerome, <i>Granted this is a bad year for computers, (so CPQ looks bad thDave B-2/27/2002
4201<B>NOW I am angry!</b> The "witch" actually paid someone Kirk ©-2/27/2002
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News