SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4240twas an accusation on your part. The obligation to substantiate it, is on you. Ione_less-1/27/2003
4239If I went back I am sure I could, but I have no time for that.The Philosopher-1/27/2003
4238Not a problem for me. Why?one_less-1/27/2003
4237Careful, there. Are you sure you want to be seen publicly agreeing with me? &lThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4236<i>"We are not discussing the specifics of the incident, only the resone_less-1/27/2003
4235An open question is not, IMO, innuendo, especially when you yourself had said yoThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4234We are not discussing the specifics of the incident, only the responses to it, wThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4233Of course. Me either.one_less-1/27/2003
4232<i>I don't believe that your statement applies if we are speaking of iThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4231<b>"I suspect there may be more going on than we see. Jeff never commNeocon-1/27/2003
4230Not true on several counts: <i>"Just noting the fact that you feel ione_less-1/27/2003
4229Unfortunately, I have to agree with you this time. However, I'd like to clarone_less-1/27/2003
4228That's okay. I have no interest in causing offense, ever. Just noting the The Philosopher-1/27/2003
4227Innuendo in that??? I hardly think so.The Philosopher-1/27/2003
4226<i>Saddam and his minions are not a government and do not deserve theThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4225That was too general for me to attach real meaning to it. Sorry. I will try to tone_less-1/27/2003
4224how lyricalRainy_Day_Woman-1/27/2003
4223Maybe a tad too much innuendo........Neocon-1/27/2003
4222You do me an injustice. I am a lingering, lurking, linker.one_less-1/27/2003
4221It is not uncommon to find people whose views on whether censorship is appropriaThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4220you linker <g>Rainy_Day_Woman-1/27/2003
4219<i>"Would you had been so considerate when people were trying to sileone_less-1/27/2003
4218As Neo noted, the sentence seemed disproportionate to the offense. Therefore,The Philosopher-1/27/2003
4217<i>"Humans tend to try to make sense of circumstances. That's a none_less-1/27/2003
4216If you take any impression from that, that's in your mind, not mine. HumansThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4215<i>"if there was anything we'll never know the truth about it.&quone_less-1/27/2003
4214Well, since Jeff doesn't tell, if there was anything we'll never know thThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4213I do not care to speculate.......Neocon-1/27/2003
4212I suspect there may be more going on than we see. Jeff never comments on his suThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4211I am not his arch enemy. Not at all, He has made many, but I just consider himThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4210OK, thanks for the clarification......Neocon-1/27/2003
4209I have always made some allowance for human weakness. You yourself have profitedNeocon-1/27/2003
4208You are certainly correct, and, what is more, expressed it well.......Neocon-1/27/2003
4207Nope. It was a slur on peaceniks......Neocon-1/27/2003
4206Very interesting....Neocon-1/27/2003
4205Offering assistance is good. That's where intervention is appropriate -- whThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4204What stuff? He is all over the place.one_less-1/27/2003
4203<i>"Are your principles so wavering that they rely on who you're one_less-1/27/2003
4202As I understand the difference, the primary focus of libertarianism is anti-goveThe Philosopher-1/27/2003
4201Read his stuff. You'll understand. Or, worse, you won't.The Philosopher-1/27/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News