SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
42771 130 0 NOVL
Emcee:  scott blomquist Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
42496Open Letter to the Community from Novell novell.com I hope this begins to clarPJ Strifas-11/20/2006
42495IF what this article says becomes true then NOVL would actually be worth somethPaul Fiondella-11/20/2006
42494I now see where you are coming from Netware is dead long live Netware. Have youPaul Fiondella-11/20/2006
42493Amazing but they beat my timetable MSFT to work with RHAT .... NOVL 6.26 and waPaul Fiondella-11/20/2006
42492Microsoft owns Linux now, Ballmer claims Talking tough By Nick Farrell: MondayTimF-11/20/2006
42491Thanks for your keen observations. Novell and Microsoft are wasting their breatArthur Tang-11/18/2006
4249008:54 RHAT Microsoft says it's willing, but Red Hat rejects alliance - Seatsixty2nds-11/17/2006
42489Novl. seems to be reflecting on it's self! Each day the better the news thewaldemar cyranski-11/17/2006
42488Thanks for many interesting arguments. But is your purpose to downgrade Novl? WArthur Tang-11/17/2006
42487No crystal ball, just reading many of the blogs and GROKLAW over the past week. PJ Strifas-11/16/2006
42486Big volume today in Novl. so it drops just over 4%, Obviously, somebody is not iwaldemar cyranski-11/16/2006
4248513:26 RHAT Red Hat: Microsoft willing to sign cooperation agreement with Red Hasixty2nds-11/16/2006
42484 Yes and the direction of the rest of those files is still largely up in the aiTimF-11/16/2006
42483>>My understanding is the kernel isn't likely to go GPL3 any time soonRichard J. Haynal-11/16/2006
42482 My understanding is the kernel isn't likely to go GPL3 any time soon, but TimF-11/16/2006
42481Hi >>GPL version 3 isn't retroactive right? Software released under vRichard J. Haynal-11/16/2006
42480<I> "It will surely violate GPL version 3," said Moglen, referriTimF-11/16/2006
42479Peter you must have a crystal ball. Eben Moglen, the general counsel of the FreeRichard J. Haynal-11/16/2006
42478I must admit that most enterprise sales involve some customer site evaluation ofPeter Dierks-11/15/2006
42477Sorry - my thoughts and what I typed didn't match up. I was referring to entPJ Strifas-11/15/2006
42476"99% of software sales include proof-of-concept labs which are conducted onPeter Dierks-11/15/2006
42475Hi, >>Well the Novell spin on this would be ... This agreement prevents iRichard J. Haynal-11/15/2006
42474>>>Why would Novell pay Microsoft not to sue its customers over patent tonysee200x-11/15/2006
42473Perhaps, the meaning of Novell partnership was not explore on this board, so thaArthur Tang-11/14/2006
42472Good point Richard. The one item that seems to be left out of all this analysis PJ Strifas-11/14/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News