SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5425 101 0
Emcee:  Shoot1st Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4250Of course you're whining - that's what you do best. I really don't cscion-6/6/2005
4249No I don't know, because I don't know if all the unnamed companies in thravenseye-6/6/2005
4248That wasn't a question! lma(zz)oravenseye-6/6/2005
4247I figued out all the companies in the indictment. Just by the discriptions and dStockDung-6/6/2005
4246You remain with a credibility problem by posting dead RB links! lma(zz)o I'ravenseye-6/6/2005
4245Are you trying to imply the media, specifically your good buddy Remond reported ravenseye-6/6/2005
4244hey dopey RB has deleted it's historical posts. Obviously, some people savedrandy johnson-6/6/2005
4243Here is the post I was replying to BTW so you dont distort it. You know well thaStockDung-6/6/2005
4242You forgot to add: "The reason is because your conspiracy theory is just plStockDung-6/6/2005
4241So? I'm not interested in your whining comments sunshine.scion-6/6/2005
4240So you are contradicting yourself? You've gone from one extreme to another, ravenseye-6/6/2005
4239I'm talking to you about your recent postings of dead RB links! I have no neravenseye-6/6/2005
4238It would have been splattered all over the media by reporters if Xybernaut was bStockDung-6/6/2005
4237There you go again, having an obvious problem with the TRUTH! scionist has been ravenseye-6/6/2005
4236You obviously have a problem dealing with an issue about the TRUTH! That is nothravenseye-6/6/2005
4235Talk to Raging Bull about the 'dead links'. I've got copies of the ascion-6/6/2005
4234At the time they where posted they where not dead linksStockDung-6/6/2005
4233At the time they where posted they where not dead linksStockDung-6/6/2005
4232I asked more that that and you are the one that avoided the question.StockDung-6/6/2005
4231It doesn't make sense to use dead links to back up comments, there is no wayravenseye-6/6/2005
4230TS, did you avoid my post to you for any specific reason? You asked <i>Whravenseye-6/6/2005
4229ragingbull updated their web site a few years ago and deleted old messages. thStockDung-6/6/2005
4228scionist, the RB links you've been posting are dead. You might want to consiravenseye-6/6/2005
4227Nope, you are so very wrong! lma(zz)oravenseye-6/6/2005
4226web.archive.org*/http://www.garydobryonlinelies.com/scion-6/6/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News