Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc.

An SI Board Since March 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3027	64	0	MNTA

Emcee: michael_f_murphy	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
427	This would be a write against my now naked stock position, so it would be more o	tuck	-	1/5/2007
426	>>Maybe this is actually a problem with PACER and the management of the co	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
425	You'd still want to be very cautious. Because if she does rule before the ex	rkrw	-	1/5/2007
424	Maybe this is actually a problem with PACER and the management of the court'	tuck	-	1/5/2007
423	Well it is a strange situation at best. The judge ordered all parties to file o	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
422	Wondering how all this affects the decision timeline. I'm thinking that if	tuck	-	1/5/2007
421	Check of Pacer still does not show Aventis to have filed their Post Trial Brief.	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
420	"So that quote rings my bell. :-)" Indeed, I like the implication as	quidditch	-	1/5/2007
419	>>But this apparent contradiction may relate to the judge's query to T	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
418	"Intent to deceive <b>having been established</b>." That&	quidditch	-	1/5/2007
417	Indeed, patent trials can be notoriously hard to predict. This one is being deci	rkrw	-	1/5/2007
416	Thanks IJ - very interesting. This discussion is relevant: patenthawk.com Rea	Biomaven	-	1/5/2007
415	One clarification. Some have read my comments as saying that the '618'	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
414	>>what was the procedural or appellate point that Amphastar's brief po	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/5/2007
413	IJ, thank you for the update! For the geeky among us, what was the procedural o	quidditch	-	1/5/2007
412	Look at the intraday move though - all the way into low 17s before moderately hi	Robohogs	-	1/4/2007
411	New corporate web site for Momenta. momentapharma.com	Go Market Go!	-	1/4/2007
410	I agree, U R the best :)	Go Market Go!	-	1/4/2007
409	IJ..with double normal daily volume, stock up 5% and a tad more in A-H I'm t	Arthur Radley	-	1/4/2007
408	Thanks mucho for the updates eom	dr.praveen	-	1/4/2007
407	Today I got the Post Trial Briefs of Teva and Amphastar. Aventis had their PTB	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/4/2007
406	Might be this should also be listed as a milestone:-)	dr.praveen	-	1/4/2007
405	But what about Democratic Senator Tim Johnson? Will he be able to serve? I gat	tuck	-	1/4/2007
404	That must be it. I was thinking erroneously, that the trial briefs had convince	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	1/4/2007
403	Wondering if Momenta is rising today coz of Democrats taking over congress:-) E	dr.praveen	-	1/4/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):