SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Nuinsco Resources (NWI)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5821 21 0 NWI
Emcee:  Doug Macklem Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4271 Whew! I'll go have that beer for you! Later! DirtpoorDirtpoor-5/13/1999
4270 NON Monsieur - results - run up - drift down - That cycle. OH I think we have Buckey-5/13/1999
4269 Buckey, Are you saying "cycle" in the large sense? Should we be pacDirtpoor-5/13/1999
4268 Ihave my LT position. I'll eat em here before I sell em and see a NR tomorBuckey-5/13/1999
4267 One more comment I forgot. No smart broker or promoter EVER buys or sells his bigjon-5/13/1999
4266 BJ I think your assumption is correct. My suspicion is this deposit runs to oneThomas A-5/13/1999
4265 .......which brings us back to the house positions. no real accumulation evideDonH-5/13/1999
4264 An outsiders point of view. I have followed this thread for a while and would bigjon-5/13/1999
4263 I assume those holes are dust. Market is telling me that this cylce is completBuckey-5/13/1999
4262 Hi Buckey, If I remember correctly, there were a few holes that had not been Dirtpoor-5/13/1999
4261 YEP - WE need an anchor to stop the drift. The only anchor is RESULTS Buckey-5/13/1999
4260Message 9177360Stephen Morley-5/13/1999
4259 Good call, we may be seeing this reach 0.50 soon. It's mostly Haywood selliDonH-5/13/1999
4258 DonH: I am not sure, but I imagine Buckey will take a look at it. ThanksJust G-5/12/1999
4257 House Positions for NWI from 05/12/99 to 05/12/99 Nothing outstanding... But DonH-5/12/1999
4256 Brumell: I can't base this on rumours, I will have to wait for a coJust G-5/12/1999
4255 Noticed your comment about Dumont and would like to attempt a response. <&Brumell-5/11/1999
4254 At this point, I'm limiting(?) myself to TSE/VSE, and as such I realize thaDonH-5/11/1999
4253 Tom Cat: I agree with you. I don't know if it will go that low, asJust G-5/11/1999
4252 gb, I saw this before, and states the obvious, there is apotential, lots of tarTom Cat-5/11/1999
4251 Don: Nothing reasonable other than lack of intrest.DNI has had increased volumeThomas A-5/11/1999
4250 House Positions for NWI from 05/11/99 to 05/11/99 Can anyone find anything of DonH-5/11/1999
4249 Thanks for the info G! Much appreciated as always! DirtpoorDirtpoor-5/11/1999
4248 I have just spoken to someone up in the la roche area. They tell me, that workJust G-5/11/1999
4247 Appreciate that. It is your choice, but until, they tell me the project is deaJust G-5/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News