Zenyatta VS Canada Carbon Board | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
Zenyatta VS Canada Carbon Board

An SI Board Since August 2016

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
603	33	4

Emcee: NuclearCrystals	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
428	"Canada Carbon demonstrated continuity of supply to X-Energy" , dispel	NuclearCrystals	1	9/14/2016
427	Hard to dismiss the other big players that are part of this huge developing stor	jiggydo	2	9/14/2016
426	So, I guess we can now hope that the Knats will no longer address that it takes	the Chief	4	9/14/2016
425	Canada Carbon to Explore Testing of Thermally Upgraded Graphite for X-energy	the Chief	1	9/14/2016
424	Clyde it never ceases to amaze me that you still want to be a critic of CCB but	the Chief	-	9/13/2016
423	Mr chief you mentioned Asbury Surely you have read that this property was worke	Clyde Spaulding	-	9/13/2016
422	Thats absolutely true, past performance is not indicative of future performance.	the Chief	2	9/13/2016
421	Well by that theory, you are not very good anymore. You used to be a great trad	Glorieux	2	9/13/2016
420	I see you cannot read either. I do not use past history because its a useless ef	the Chief	-	9/13/2016
419	Chief, how is it possible that a former poster BNS could find the list of Bruce	Glorieux	4	9/13/2016
418	that statement is clear to me.	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016
417	$3500/ton for value added processed and micronized high purity graphite - "	Shoto	2	9/13/2016
416	Which part of this statement is open to interpretation? "Program to furthe	NuclearCrystals	-	9/13/2016
415	Speaking of problem press releases March 11th, 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada – C	Jayfish	4	9/13/2016
414	the pr's are as clear or unclear as the two of you want them to be.	CantwaitforPEA	1	9/13/2016
413	Thats the point, you can read ZEN NRs and get 5 different interpretations. Alway	the Chief	-	9/13/2016
412	"you people" pointless	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016
411	kind of, sort of, but not really you can twist the pr any way you want. Pointl	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016
410	The language in the last presser kind of said so, look at how they interchange p	NuclearCrystals	-	9/13/2016
409	Message 30741122 "When the RE came out and he screamed "the pipes a	the Chief	-	9/13/2016
408	Yes, I know ......... "dusters" is how you people categorize them even	NuclearCrystals	-	9/13/2016
407	there was never any mention of a pilot plant for graphene production in a PR, so	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016
406	no one said anything about the "last" drill holes. we were talking ab	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016
405	Did you ask specifically if there was a pilot plant for graphene production ....	NuclearCrystals	-	9/13/2016
404	really? I gave him the answers, now he'll just try to twist them for his ca	CantwaitforPEA	-	9/13/2016

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):