SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Bio Technology General - BTGC
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2028 28 0 BTGC
Emcee:  Lee Goodman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
428 Regis: I was pleased to read Woodhouse's '96/early'97 research in twm sharp-3/4/1997
427 To All: Does anyone have their home page address? Capitalist-3/4/1997
426 Folks, Just found this site, it seems like a great resource! Colin T. Madine-3/4/1997
425 Lucretuis, my take on the situation is this. Today's pop was due to invesLee Goodman-3/4/1997
424 To All, here's Paul Woodhouse, the M.L. analyst intraday update on BTGC. *Regis McConnell-3/4/1997
423 L.T., Your're right about the current action and it looks like distributioFred Zurofsky-3/4/1997
422 Regis, I don't really know, but he's my friend on the WTT (communicatiFred Zurofsky-3/4/1997
421 12 is the 100 day moving average. I like to think we'll test it sometime sLucretius-3/4/1997
420 Fred, very well put. Diversity of opinion is paramount to wisdom, & I certaRegis McConnell-3/4/1997
419 Lucretius, clever, very clever. Let me first acknowledge your dexterity w/numbeRegis McConnell-3/4/1997
418 BTGC is a way over valued. Don't just look at the current stock price, you NORMAN DUNNWYN-3/4/1997
417 Passing on the follow-up analysis from the Individual Investor site. Mike Diorio-3/4/1997
416 Regis-- Couldn't agree more. The pomposity displayed by Mr. Taurus makes LLLefty-3/4/1997
415 Regis, What's your problem? Could it be that your saw and read some good aFred Zurofsky-3/4/1997
414 I took another look @ it and changed my mind. The stock just came way too far Lucretius-3/4/1997
413 L.T. are you really as pompus and arrogant as you 'sound'? Perhaps baitRegis McConnell-3/4/1997
412 You are right! Except the earnings is for the year, not for the quarter. Here iRichard Ogier-3/4/1997
411 Btgc earned .23 for 4th quarter ending 96. The confusion seems to be the confusEd's Head-3/4/1997
410 Mike: Makes sense to me. BTG seems on track for whatever low ball, sketchy 'wm sharp-3/4/1997
409 Definetely intresting dynamics!!!!! In my last post I pointed out the insider snein na-3/4/1997
408 L.T.: "25bucks Tomorrowers"? Try 30. I refer you to your post #224. Awm sharp-3/3/1997
407 CAP, I believe because of the complexity of the press release today and the foMike Diorio-3/3/1997
406 CAP: Thanks for posting the report this morning. Looks great; the company'swm sharp-3/3/1997
405 Lucretius, Had the day off today and I watched BTGC open "up" then drCAP-3/3/1997
404 L.T. or anyone; Maybe I haven't searched far enough in the past posts fortommysdad-3/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News