SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam?
An SI Board Since July 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4624 30 0 CSHD
Emcee:  peter michaelson Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4299Wow, Rufus is truly losing his grip on reality. The SEC stole my records!?!? Ha Infinite-12/19/2007
4298Posted by: beachcracker In reply to: None Date:12/18/2007 12:36:55 PM Post #ofanniebonny-12/18/2007
4297nope i didn't lose anything, and i posted as much when i got in and out. iglassy I bozo-12/14/2007
4296So you only lost a measly grand, then it's all OK. Who gives a shit about tGib Bogle-12/14/2007
4295PG, i had a measly grand tied up in it. and i didn't buy until it was at 1$ glassy I bozo-12/11/2007
4294RE: So much anger, by a real bozo A discussion boardPurl Gurl-12/10/2007
4293there's only one explanation for so much anger: Here I am again in this meaglassy I bozo-12/9/2007
4292Merry Christmas Rufus! Ho Ho HO! Merry ChPurl Gurl-12/4/2007
4291Thank you posting that. I'm just now getting caught up on all the events sifrugalgranny-11/19/2007
4290Have a criminal trial and give him life for all I care. I know that is a little Infinite-11/18/2007
4289PACER Update: SEC MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT By: carmelbeach 17 Nov 2007, 04scion-11/18/2007
4288Yep, it's bad. I'm sorry I didn't post the reply that Harris had, afrugalgranny-11/12/2007
4287oooh that *is* bad... lol, see no one has posted Harris' latest--he filed T E X-11/10/2007
4286If you're referring to MySpace, yes it was. It may have also been a violatifrugalgranny-11/6/2007
4285seems like that would violate the host's TOS, doesn't it? well, not TOST E X-11/5/2007
4284You're not only right, but their behavior got even worse. I have no sympathfrugalgranny-11/1/2007
4283I can't see this as sad, because I remember how those people treated those wGib Bogle-11/1/2007
4282So true. However, most of them are confusing civil with criminal court and sayifrugalgranny-10/31/2007
4281It is a good thing. They can stop having a belief in Rufus. All they have to do Infinite-10/31/2007
4280<i>Update: SEC v Conversion, Harris</i> By: carmelbeach 30 Oct 20scion-10/30/2007
4279The truly sad part is that Rufie's followers on his board actually think thifrugalgranny-10/30/2007
4278<i>The Court moreover agrees with the SEC’s position that Mr. Harris was nscion-10/30/2007
4277<i>Defendant Harris cannot claim that he was unaware of the Complaint or tscion-10/30/2007
4276Pacer update, borrowed from elsewhere. ORDER granting [15] Motion to Strike re frugalgranny-10/30/2007
4275Well you know the saying...Same ol ___ just another day! Hopefully unsuspecting Infinite-10/26/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News