SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
PLAYFAIR MINING - PLY . V
An SI Board Since May 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
505 11 0 PLY
Emcee:  Brumell Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
430Great line. I'm still chuckling :-)Brumell-11/27/2001
429Based on this report two things are obvious. First, the setting for replacement Elizabeth Andrews-11/27/2001
428We all have our opinions Red, i'll chance it and hold. Regards HJust G-11/26/2001
427Smoke and Mirrors NR they found SWEET TWEET. Just another PUMP job by the old LARocket Red-11/26/2001
426Playfair's Nr indicated two things, eliminated the possibility of contaminatJust G-11/26/2001
425jp: Thanks, but I'll stick with Mosher's analysis. ;-) Geoffgeoffb_si-11/26/2001
424For those not familiar with RC drilling, have a look: midnightsundrilling.com jpthoma1-11/26/2001
423I know you don't accept my theory, sniff, sniff!! ;o)) But, I still think jpthoma1-11/26/2001
422Hi JP, I don't accept that overlying, now eroded theory. Can't see it Brumell-11/26/2001
421Well Bob, I think they have hit the feeder of the overlying, now eroded deposit,jpthoma1-11/26/2001
420Claude, Jim Steele, jp t, your takes on the NR? tomloantech-11/26/2001
419There's a NR of PLY's website....... Mon Nov 26, 2001 Bedrock ConfirmedBrumell-11/26/2001
418Always tough to come back from one of those warm places,.... <<<Two shrusset-11/26/2001
417Agree. The truth machine will tell!!! JPjpthoma1-11/26/2001
416jp: The analysis done by Mosher is very convincing to me. Guess we'll bothgeoffb_si-11/26/2001
415I agree, it probably has a bedrock source. But, not from underlying bedrock, acjpthoma1-11/26/2001
414Hi, jp: There is very little evidence of contamination, as detailed in Mosher&#geoffb_si-11/26/2001
413<How about Metallica?> A bit higher valuation than IP, CTQ, and TNK, but russwinter-11/26/2001
412Russ: How about Metallica? Thanks, Geoffgeoffb_si-11/26/2001
411I have worked in tropical terranes and have seen sub-weathered zone material graBruce Robbins-11/26/2001
410<50 m of 1.5% Cu put into $3-$5 zone> That would be a diluted market cap russwinter-11/26/2001
409<i>Also, I have read about another theory which could explain the situatiojpthoma1-11/26/2001
408Two shots??? that all? We cultivated a bartender last week, and it got a little MrsNose-11/26/2001
407it do not take much to give one the blues.rockerbanger-11/26/2001
406Sounds like this squished hamster is getting re-inflated. ;-) Here's to migeoffb_si-11/26/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News