SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6784 120 0
Emcee:  Tim McGee Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4334Bill: Sorry for the acronyms. EM=E-Mail, IM=Instant Messaging. OT: On the CODavid E. Taylor-3/20/2001
4333TG & Thread: Samsung/Sprint announced Samsung's Palm OS based PDA/CDMA David E. Taylor-3/20/2001
4332David, Forgive my ignorance; what be EM and IM applications? TIA OFF TOPIC: HaveBill Coenen-3/20/2001
4331TG: Take a look at the Palm PR on the M500/505 on the Palm.com website. OS4.0 hDavid E. Taylor-3/20/2001
4330Thanks. Doesn't say that the m505 will have instant notification/messaging. TechieGuy-alt-3/20/2001
4329FNS: OT: Beats me what people were expecting from the Fed today. More than 1/David E. Taylor-3/20/2001
4328PALM acting strong against this GREENSPAN BEAR market..PALM down slightly but RIFNS-3/20/2001
4327I wonder if the joint Qcom/G* announcement re:packet data services and Palm'Sawtooth-3/20/2001
4326Thanks, David, for your interpretation of the BREW PalmOS relationship. As a PASouze-3/20/2001
4325Robertson Stephens today reiterated its BUY rating on PALM, per Briefing.com as Souze-3/20/2001
4324Mang & Thread: Some indication here of how Qualcomm's BREW application David E. Taylor-3/20/2001
4323Finally, here is someone that agrees with my assessmant that PALM is experienciTom R. Clarksburg-3/20/2001
4322Re:"Public sector users, including the U.S. Armed Forces, the U.S. Post OffMang Cheng-3/20/2001
4321The Yankowsky's interview didn't really say much. I think it's quitMang Cheng-3/20/2001
4320zdii.comJohn Liu-3/20/2001
4319David: re <Maybe the markets and investors will have short memories and forgFNS-3/19/2001
4318Mang/Tom: I don't think MSFT's PEG has exceeded 2.0 since 1994, which wDavid E. Taylor-3/19/2001
4317Mang, you don't need to reverse calculate. I believe in that Yahoo data you Tom R. Clarksburg-3/19/2001
4316yeah, I guess we shall see. I hope you are wrong too :)Tom R. Clarksburg-3/19/2001
4315Tom, historical quote for msft on its first day. Your $28 is right !! chart.yMang Cheng-3/19/2001
4314LOL! Newbridge was a disaster of a company, but the guy can't be blamed for Win-Lose-Draw-3/19/2001
4313Tom, I could certainly be wrong about PALM, and it wouldn't be the first timWin-Lose-Draw-3/19/2001
4312WLD: So where does Chahil sit on your scale of positives/negatives for Palm, wiDavid E. Taylor-3/19/2001
4311> Daniel: I bet you would agree that qcom and all this othe WTO Free Trade inDaniel-3/19/2001
4310Winlosedraw: Microsoft had very little profitability even when it first went PUTom R. Clarksburg-3/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):