SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4360It'sa shame. I was a strong supporter of the UN back in the 60s. It could The Philosopher-2/12/2003
4359Where is the line between harboring a wrong doer, and complicit in this case? Ione_less-2/12/2003
4358If the gang is threatening to invade unless you expel the trespasser, does that one_less-2/12/2003
4357My wife needs a to be picked up. See you later!Neocon-2/12/2003
4356Someone who knowingly sends a person out to be beaten, when no harm is being donNeocon-2/12/2003
4355If no specific legal charges would stick, how would you label moral offense?one_less-2/12/2003
4354I believe that if he knows you are in danger, he is liable, at least to a civil Neocon-2/12/2003
4353Generally, he can have you detained by the police. However, you will not be charNeocon-2/12/2003
4352If the property owner force-ably expells you into the waiting grasp of the gang.one_less-2/12/2003
4351You might be let off if you explain. However, you are right, there is no automatNeocon-2/12/2003
4350At what point does the property owner have the right to have you expelled into tone_less-2/12/2003
4349Right. Property rights wins in this conflict if you are charged. Can you imagineone_less-2/12/2003
4348Sure. I might very well trespass, for example, if not doing so would place me inNeocon-2/12/2003
4347Can you imagine a conflict between "a right of conscience to judge of the pone_less-2/12/2003
4346It is a right of conscience to judge of the particular circumstances one finds oNeocon-2/12/2003
4345How would you categorize this area of autonomy. It doesn't seem to come undeone_less-2/12/2003
4344I would say that respect for authority is compatible with exercising private judNeocon-2/12/2003
4343Rothbard uses very fresh language. I looked him up based on your discussion withone_less-2/12/2003
4342<i>"The individual does not have sovereignty over such an authority, one_less-2/12/2003
4341Montaigne was moderate, yes, but he overemphasized the personal nature of opinioNeocon-2/12/2003
4340Good op- ed, underscoring the bankruptcy of the UN.....Neocon-2/12/2003
4339The individual does not have sovereignty over such an authority, but is relievedNeocon-2/12/2003
4338<i>Montaigne merely expresses a point of view</i> I think he believTom Clarke-2/12/2003
4337nothing more reasonable too , than to expect a room full of economists reaching 2MAR$-2/11/2003
4336This case would come under a grey area for me: Is it assisting someone strugglione_less-2/11/2003
4335Does an individual have sovereignty over a controlling authority that the indivione_less-2/11/2003
4334Sure there are. Just from the start, reason cannot tell us the actual landscape,Neocon-2/11/2003
4333In general, it is the system itself, ordered to make the magistracy responsible Neocon-2/11/2003
4332<i>"Ashcroft, however, has decided his values should overrule those oSolon-2/11/2003
4331Allow terminally ill to choose how to die By Joan Ryan Peggy Sutherland of PorLane3-2/11/2003
4330Do you think there are limits on reason? Can there be an excessive use of reasTom Clarke-2/11/2003
4329<i>"...the claims of external authority are always subject to criticione_less-2/11/2003
4328Claims to authority have to be adjudicated, therefore reason is the primary authNeocon-2/11/2003
4327Here is the piece that I parsed from what you said: </i>"...groundedone_less-2/11/2003
4326I am afraid what you said made little sense to me, except to note that you garblNeocon-2/11/2003
4325<i>"...grounded in the authority of reason...</i> If we agree one_less-2/11/2003
4324This is grounded in the authority of reason, not to mandate, but to permit......Neocon-2/11/2003
4323<i>"Without more rigorous argument, it is nevertheless clear that a bone_less-2/11/2003
4322People who advance that kind of skepticism put up an impossible model of rationaNeocon-2/11/2003
4321How do you answer this challenge? <i>"The big difference is that nowone_less-2/11/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):