SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4367Bob, I feel that this was a good week. I think particularly where CVSN and CLPwashcapsfan-1/13/2001
4366From the Jan 3rd post: "A truly major opportunity lies not in picking the michael r potter-1/13/2001
4365washcapsfan, I know you hold SFE, CVSN, PACW and CLPA. It's been a very gorobert miller-1/12/2001
4364Series of announcements: biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoowashcapsfan-1/10/2001
4363Michael, OT I feel the same way. On Tuesday all of the talking heads were sayirobert miller-1/3/2001
4362This bodes well: (DOCC news as well) Ethentica, Lockheed Martin Unite to Supplywashcapsfan-1/3/2001
4361Ooops...Couldn't agree more Michael.... I knew it was early in the morning!washcapsfan-1/3/2001
4360Couldn't agree more Bob.... There is a lot of doom and gloom out there, andwashcapsfan-1/3/2001
4359A funny thing happened on the way to the poorhouse....They stopped going down!!!michael r potter-1/3/2001
4358About NAV: MLD posted this on RB; has links to some posts on Yahoo. ragingbullJune-1/1/2001
4357OT reply: Vanguard Energy is not sexy. Pretty conservative- they hold a mix. Ovemichael r potter-12/28/2000
4356In a nutshell, the results of my research are as follows: ENE -premier bandwidthGary Kao-12/27/2000
4355How has it the Vang Energy Fund done in recent years? I remember looking at it aGary Kao-12/27/2000
4354OT: Gary, I agree with you about energy. Instead of picking individual issues, Imichael r potter-12/27/2000
4353Gary, I agree with the instinct on energy stocks. I would be curious as to thowashcapsfan-12/27/2000
4352I'm struck by the lack of energy-related stocks in your trades and holdings.Gary Kao-12/27/2000
4351Gary, Surviving this year? Yes, but it's been the most challenging of 20 fulmichael r potter-12/27/2000
4350Michael, I just got back into SFE with a small position. The investing communirobert miller-12/26/2000
4349Thanks for your thoughts...have you been surviving this terrible year? Are you Gary Kao-12/22/2000
4348LOL - First lesson for you - be accurate if you are going to attack someone. SeMGV-12/22/2000
4347hello mgv, ibought sfe at much higherlevels. been faniliar with your posts from gancho-12/21/2000
4346Good thoughts. SFE doesn't get to $5 without tremendous negatives being disMGV-12/21/2000
4345Mike, just wanted to check in to say hello and happy New Year to all. Having bestill learning-12/21/2000
4344Look at the the tremendous negatives built into SFE's stock price right now.michael r potter-12/21/2000
4343Janney report is interesting. One question that it didn't even try to answeRick-12/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News