SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX /COMS - and other "stuff"
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5244 4 0 COMS
Emcee:  Pullin-GS Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4369 <<< Long live the BOT! >>> David, Hear, hear..... Stupid Crzy Joe-5/29/1997
4368 Hi Adam: RE: COMS and Nteworking stocks IMHO, I think networking stocks will uu-5/29/1997
4367 I can't tell if you are complaining, joking or commenting OR all of the aboScrapps-5/29/1997
4366 Paul CHAT: I fired a couple into their camp while they were sleeping and scoutScrapps-5/29/1997
4365 Paul, here's a guy that really knows his drive-stocks, quoted in today'Dwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4364 Freeus, instead of buying 100 shares of INTCW, you could have bought more shareDwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4363 You are right IMHO. I certainly think most people are going to wait for the 100freeus-5/29/1997
4362 <i>Anyhoo, this study noted that stocks in the 80-90 range appreciated MUDwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4361 < I have to admire him for his courage and fortitude under fire, if only forFred Fahmy-5/29/1997
4360 Absolutely. I wouldn't want to take a dime of it away from him. I have to aDwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4359 <i>I always thought Nike was a Janpanese company. Little do I know</i&Dwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4358 <things are indeed looking up for Mr. Cowell's personal fortune> As Fred Fahmy-5/29/1997
4357 <i>"We are just putting the pedal right to the floor."</i>Dwight E. Karlsen-5/29/1997
4356 Rocky do you predict an iom breakout soon? high p/e? can they meet supply? whenralph keating-5/28/1997
4355 Jeff, 100 sounds good to me....for COMS!!!Price Monger-5/28/1997
4354 Chat stuff Some interesting "discussion" taking place on the "1Pullin-GS-5/28/1997
4353 I'm taking a break from my duties on the Iomega thread to publically thank Rocky Reid-5/28/1997
4352 David, I echo your sentiments. <b>Waaaaaaaaaaaaaahoooooooooooooooooo<Dwight E. Karlsen-5/28/1997
4351 <i>This is a damn rocket ship.</i> You got that right Toto. We'Dwight E. Karlsen-5/28/1997
4350 Man Addi I've never heard anyone who complains more then you...have you eveDruggist-5/28/1997
4349 I don't think we will see much profit taking until we get to the 100 range Tim Luke-5/28/1997
4348 Hi Sonny. Of course, I am always glad to be on board when things go up!!! I bofreeus-5/28/1997
4347 aren't we going to have a lot of selling tomorrow due to profit taking, youJWL-5/28/1997
4346 Its so difficult to tell, maybe a bit of both. USRX has had positive feedback ofreeus-5/28/1997
4345 Jeff... Any T/A logic for the "100 very soon" ?? Is there little or nJHC44-5/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):