Long Term Investors' Outpost | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Long Term Investors' Outpost

An SI Board Since July 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
562	66	0

Emcee: Uncle Frank	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
437	It's always a pleasure, Huey.	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
436	<i> If these "options police" want options expensed using black-	TimbaBear	-	8/20/2002
435	<If I don't like the rules I don't have to play.> exactly.	kumar	-	8/20/2002
434	A company I worked for was not doing very well (still fairly profitable etc), bu	alanrs	-	8/20/2002
433	<i>Us new economy babes need more action than an options-expensing debate	hueyone	-	8/20/2002
432	Employee options are a special case, since they can only be traded (exercised) a	alanrs	-	8/20/2002
431	<Are we on the same page?> Chaz, maybe not :-) A company I worked for wa	kumar	-	8/20/2002
430	Kumar... uf wrote:<i>The concept behind stock options is that they are wo	chaz	-	8/20/2002
429	Us new economy babes need more action than an options-expensing debate can provi	Lizzie Tudor	-	8/20/2002
428	Thanks for the gentlemanly discussion today, Uncle Frank. I am heading back to	hueyone	-	8/20/2002
427	<i>Many of the companies granting stock options were doing well already. A	kumar	-	8/20/2002
426	And all this time I was secretly hoping to get a date with you.	hueyone	-	8/20/2002
425	Its only a few people bringing up this options issue, and they go from thread to	Lizzie Tudor	-	8/20/2002
424	UF... <i>The concept behind stock options is that they are worthless at t	chaz	-	8/20/2002
423	>> It is really quite comical that I am sitting here with a successful tr	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
422	<i>They gambled that they would be valuable in the future. They lost on th	hueyone	-	8/20/2002
421	That doesn't work. You'd be spending money on premiums, not generating	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
420	>It would be interesting to hear a few examples, Huey. I can't imagine ho	DiB	-	8/20/2002
419	If one doesn't like how a company handles options, one can choose to not inv	alanrs	-	8/20/2002
418	>> If stock options are worthless when granted, why did people accept them	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
417	<i>Huey, I don't even like Lieberman, but I'm ruffled by your alle	hueyone	-	8/20/2002
416	You've got a great memory, Jay. I was really upset in late 1999 when Q was	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
415	Nothing I could see. Just pure conjecture, that part. Doesn't help your argu	Jay	-	8/20/2002
414	Jay, is there something in that link that documents Lieberman was paid off for h	Uncle Frank	-	8/20/2002
413	<<option to buy one share of QCOM with a two day vesting period, and I fur	kumar	-	8/20/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):