SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RF Monolithics (RFMI)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
369 7 0 RFMI
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44 Try Investor Daily on the internet. The registration is free. They feature thAmar-2/1/1997
43 Michael: Where can I find the article on the net? I am over in Germany, and ddennis michael patterson-1/31/1997
42 Quite an article indeed! I grew horns. Talk to me. First tell me what that 4Doo-1/28/1997
41 Michael, I understand that Investor's Business Daily has an article on pageT. Jones-1/28/1997
40 Dennis - Two firms I referred to are WOODRUFF & COMVEST - also,long time fomichael b greenberg-1/25/1997
39 Michael: 400,000 shares traded yesterday and the bid moves up only an eighth ofdennis michael patterson-1/24/1997
38 MICHAEL. I think that with all the talk about the market moving from large to dennis michael patterson-1/23/1997
37 check out rfm's new web site @ www.rfm.com T. Jones-1/22/1997
36 Dennis - Sawtek is the co I referred to in a recent comment - Your comments as michael b greenberg-1/20/1997
35 AT least one competitor-- SAWTEK-- has been a very successful IPO. The problemdennis michael patterson-1/19/1997
34 Wang - 18 this year!! Tape action has been very encouraging as of recent severamichael b greenberg-1/18/1997
33 two positive things happened: One is the sector for electronic component is in wang-1/17/1997
32 Well, its starting to fly again. Anybody hear anything?Mr.Creosote-1/17/1997
31 RFMI, as other smaller stocks, does not respond to market. They have their own wang-1/16/1997
30 Wang - I have been selectively been a buyer at levels below 9. This is a hard tmichael b greenberg-1/15/1997
29 Info forwarded was taken off of comvest research report. I tend to agree with ymichael b greenberg-1/8/1997
28 michael, don't believe that estimate. Right now, there is no good indicatiowang-1/8/1997
27 Appreciate your comments. Comvest is rating RFMI as a strong buy - est earningmichael b greenberg-1/6/1997
26 yes. 1994! wangwang-1/6/1997
25 was that meant to be 1996????jerry simons-1/6/1997
24 RFMI's HX1000 transmitter was named one of the 12 best technology products wang-1/6/1997
23 Phil - I think stock a very good buy at current level - feel stock will slowly michael b greenberg-12/30/1996
22 This issue has seemed to hang. Anyone with thoughts on future movements here? Phil Rogers-12/27/1996
21 I agree - The computer area of multiple clocks is most exciting & am glad tmichael b greenberg-12/19/1996
20 In line with expectations (somewhat better than I have hoped for the next Q andwang-12/18/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News