TigerInvestor.com: The site for aggressive investors

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
TigerInvestor.com: The site for aggressive investors

An SI Board Since April 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1022	15	0

Emcee: Tae Spam Kim	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
447	Let, you are more than welcome to post your due diligence and thoughts on this	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/25/1999
446	Here are my main holdings if anyone is interested, they are also the ones that	let	-	5/25/1999
445	I mentioned SONE a week or so ago on there, haven't gotten around to doing	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/25/1999
444	Blank, you got me on the fulfillment costs. :) Anyone have any idea what Amazo	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/25/1999
443	SONE is Securities First Network but not bank-- they sold that and they are jus	john g	-	5/25/1999
442	One of the biggest issue in evaluating AMZN is determining whether they are hid	MSI	-	5/25/1999
441	I went long SONE yesterday. They will dominate their sector like RNWK does in	Dale Baker	-	5/25/1999
440	This stock has been mentioned before, but with the recent pullback in it ... I	let	-	5/25/1999
439	one place they put losses from the 10-q <i>Marketing and sales expenses	blankmind	-	5/24/1999
438	They did all those bond offerings to raise money to 1. acquire hot technology c	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
437	that is why they did a 1.25 billion bond offering earlier this year, and has la	blankmind	-	5/24/1999
436	I hope Amazon.com doesn't eat the shipping & handling, they are chargin	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
435	we will have to disagree on amzn, but they are losing big $$$ and not because o	blankmind	-	5/24/1999
434	Another msg by SteelJim on VMIX: VMIX--Received its prospectus two days after	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
433	Lets, I never meant to say the Digital acquisition is a flop.. the word is stil	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
432	Tae, I disagree with you on the CPQ purchase of Digital, as with all aquisiti	let	-	5/24/1999
431	Amazon.com IS profitable if you take away their marketing costs. The company c	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
430	amzn loses money on most orders because of the packaging and shipping costs inv	blankmind	-	5/24/1999
429	Small items? What about eToys and Amazon.com? They both succeeded. Compaq	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/24/1999
428	cpq felt they needed to branch out and failed so far. can dell learn from cpq&#	blankmind	-	5/24/1999
427	I agree that Dell need to branch out into other competencies. I believe they w	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/23/1999
426	dell is starting to look like cpq. clearly dell is growing at a fantastic rate	blankmind	-	5/23/1999
425	Dell is still growing at a fantastic rate. And with new e-commerce initiatives	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/23/1999
424	<i>And one last word from Tae Kim ..."For all those Dell worrywarts	blankmind	-	5/21/1999
423	I got quoted in this CBS Marketwatch article today. :) -Tae All Aboard! - Hear	Tae Spam Kim	-	5/21/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):