ATEC Group. Huge growth with PE of 12.5!

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
ATEC Group. Huge growth with PE of 12.5!

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1298	3	0	ATEC

Emcee: Andrew G.	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
448	Let's all hope Mike reveals some conquering explanations before say, 9:15AM	S.C. Barnard	-	10/7/1997
447	<i>I am pissed.That SOB looked at me stright in the eye over the phone an	Steve Childs	-	10/7/1997
446	>>Perhaps Mike will have good news for all of us.<< Yeah, perhaps	Andrew H	-	10/7/1997
445	>>Take a look at Mike's post on the subject. Pretty slick! He was spe	Andrew H	-	10/7/1997
444	This will be my first experience with a reverse split and I was reading up on i	Patricia	-	10/7/1997
443	>>Message from Mike Irving on Oct 6 1997 9:56AM EST MITCH: Between you S	Andrew H	-	10/7/1997
442	This is the last post here from Mike Irving... Oct 6 1997 9:56AM EST Reply #	Patricia	-	10/7/1997
441	Seems like the point is that management and Mike cannot be trusted. Management	Andrew H	-	10/7/1997
440	Joe and all I bought in Monday. With that reverse, I'm outta here Tuesday	Jack Kanak	-	10/7/1997
439	What is TST and how do I find it? Did Cheryl buy this one? Is everyone going	Mary Beth Ford	-	10/7/1997
438	Jan, It appears that your instincts may have proven to be quite accurate. Sadd	Frederick Langford	-	10/7/1997
437	Seems to me that Mike is conspicuous by his absence....already.	Clarence Wilson	-	10/7/1997
436	TM. How about ACLY? The did reverse 1 for 4( $2.25 to 9)and look where are they	Steve Rubakh	-	10/6/1997
435	Hi Jan, Read quite a few of the posts on TST - my response- UGH!! Dr. Dode	DR. DODE	-	10/6/1997
434	Jan <s there any recourse if we've been deceived?> Oh Yeah!! And ya k	rt1^	-	10/6/1997
433	Mitch, I don't know. You could be right. The 144's don't bother	Cisco	-	10/6/1997
432	144,s were filed on 09/12/97 for elise and danny prefer to sell 36k each at abo	Mitch	-	10/6/1997
431	Damm right!	TokyoMex	-	10/6/1997
430	Well lets see if there is still a need for a reverse split. filed on Oct 6 199	TokyoMex	-	10/6/1997
429	TokyoMex, Take a look at Mike's post on the subject. Pretty slick! He wa	Cisco	-	10/6/1997
428	What is the date of the proposed reverse split?	Robert W. Popejoy	-	10/6/1997
427	Dear TokyoMex- Are PR people under the same rules as the companies they represe	jan m.	-	10/6/1997
426	I will make some calls tomorrow. I also would like to hear from Mike.	TokyoMex	-	10/6/1997
425	Dear Dr Dode- If you think that's disconcerting, check out the posts on TST	jan m.	-	10/6/1997
424	Is there any way someone can call this guy now? It's sort of important.	S.C. Barnard	-	10/6/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):