SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Investment Chat Board Lawsuits for Pros – moderated
An SI Board Since April 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
120 7 0
Emcee:  Tom C Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
45You're below my level.rrufff-4/16/2005
44I think you're whacked out and are butting in something you obviously have nrrufff-4/16/2005
43Not that I really have to defend myself but things seem to have started around hrrufff-4/16/2005
42<i>OK now for the name calling </i> Sticks and stones.... I'lTom C-4/16/2005
41<i>This is what got you hedgie shortie defenders all upset.</i> ThaTom C-4/16/2005
40My first posts on the thread in this vein were about naked shorts. I was attackrrufff-4/16/2005
39Not true - I posted that there are paid touts and paid bashers. I answered onrrufff-4/16/2005
38<i>You're a liar.</i> Proof, please. <i>Go back to my Tom C-4/16/2005
37You're a liar. Go back to my original posts. You come in the middle of somrrufff-4/16/2005
36<i>reams and reams about old touts and other off topic crap.</i> YoJeffrey S. Mitchell-4/16/2005
35<i>You came after me for posting about naked shorting and hedge funds.<Tom C-4/16/2005
34There is no discussion. You have your little realm and you are ruler there. Irrufff-4/16/2005
33Figured I'd post this over here since this seems like a better place to contJeffrey S. Mitchell-4/16/2005
32You came after me for posting about naked shorting and hedge funds. If you trulrrufff-4/16/2005
31<i>you are the defender of the hedgie shortie crew</i> Find one posTom C-4/16/2005
30Message 21236703 <i>I haven't attacked anyone here until being attackTom C-4/16/2005
29<i>Hey puxxy - you are a coward, pretending to ignore and then reading eveTom C-4/16/2005
28Baseball score: NATs 2 DBACKs 0 in the fifth. Go NATsTom C-4/16/2005
27In my book, you are a coward, pretending to ignore and then reading every post. rrufff-4/16/2005
26Hey rufff, What's going on? It's not like you to let someone have the lTom C-4/16/2005
25<i>This Board is a farce and a failure, ...apparently populated by a bunchTom C-4/16/2005
24<i>But, I can appreciate that the old "..AnthoPuke bashing habits..&qTom C-4/16/2005
23This Board is a farce and a failure, ...apparently populated by a bunch of spinejmhollen-4/16/2005
22OFF TOPIC... It's great to have Baseball in Washington again. I don't tTom C-4/16/2005
21O/T: Gee, Tom....... ...This isn't RB where you have to <i>"..pjmhollen-4/16/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):