SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ISSM
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5211 10 0 ISSM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4511 Brad; Yes, I agree in principle with your points, but I would put them with a dDavid Bogdanoff-4/28/1997
4510 David: In regards to your post about what evidence there is that GAD lacks a lCathi Wierzbicki-4/28/1997
4509 Darrell: As I believe I posted months ago I was told that APT insisted on a prCathi Wierzbicki-4/28/1997
4508 David; yes, this has always been a very high risk, speculative investment, and Brander-4/27/1997
4507 Joe, I agree, there is something that they like about the product. Since SGS TCatfish-4/27/1997
4506 Darrell As far as I can understand it appears that SGS Thomson believes that Joe Mruk-4/27/1997
4505 David, Obviously, there is a lack of operating capital, but eventually the tecCatfish-4/27/1997
4504 Cathi, Brad, Darrell, and other thoughtful contributors to this thread. I haveDavid Bogdanoff-4/27/1997
4503 I have not posted for quite some time on this thread, because I realized some tBrander-4/27/1997
4502 Cathi, I just copied this Q & A of Mar. 20 from the Chez Website: Q. Are yCatfish-4/27/1997
4501 Cathi, I am reposting the APT/ISSM press release below as a reference point. NoCatfish-4/27/1997
4500 Hi Darrell: You state, "I still believe that the constraints on this techCathi Wierzbicki-4/26/1997
4499 Bennett, The rumored buyout of ISSM by Motorola was supposed to be the reason fCatfish-4/26/1997
4498 Thanks Mitch. . . I think we did have every sign. . . and I do definitely beliBennett Zimmerman-4/26/1997
4497 Bennett, my apologies if you felt I was blaming you for anything. "Where amitch bailey-4/26/1997
4496 Cathi, I still believe that the constraints on this technology is financial. ICatfish-4/26/1997
4495 Guess I look at this very differently from most of the others. People seem to Cathi Wierzbicki-4/26/1997
4494 rd, At this point, I would like to see ISSM bought out, lock, stock and barrellCatfish-4/26/1997
4493 Well said, Bob. Mitch, everyone likes to think they're too smart for it tord greer-4/26/1997
4492 Hi Mitch, Long time no hear. I wrote a letter sometime in FebruaJohn L Hoge-4/26/1997
4491 Mr. Bailey, Don't ever put me in the category of recommending ISSM to you Bennett Zimmerman-4/25/1997
4490 Mitch, I think that several of the people you mentioned are still holding. I sCatfish-4/25/1997
4489 Mitch: Regarding question #3, I would say most of us are just finding it hard Bob Towery-4/25/1997
4488 Hi, folks. Long time lurker, from Jan 96. Several questions as I hold and holmitch bailey-4/25/1997
4487 Probably about 10 more days :) (eom)Scott H. Davis-4/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):