SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5867 96 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Stock Watcher Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4517I urge everyone to listen to the conference call. A lot of information was giveDonald Wennerstrom-1/23/2001
4516One thing that Bagley has accomplished is getting Lam's margins up to levelsQ.-1/23/2001
4515Lam up over a dollar in AHT. I believe the CC just started though, so that mayProud_Infidel-1/23/2001
4514Nice bookings! Boy, I wonder how those downgrades in the high teens feel now? GAll Mtn Ski-1/23/2001
4513Lam Research Corporation Announces Fiscal 2001 Second Quarter Results Record NewProud_Infidel-1/23/2001
4512Earnings are 0.58 vs 0.53 expected. Looks like we are in good shape. Now for tDonald Wennerstrom-1/23/2001
4511Hopefully they feel like SSSHHHEEEEEEEEETTTT! Way to downgrade at the bottom foAll Mtn Ski-1/16/2001
4510Wow, our dog has woken up! Up three bucks after hours. Wonder how those dorks mike thomas-1/16/2001
4509Just to make sure that we didn't miss the first downgrade of LRCX and ASYT, Jerome-1/15/2001
4508Here is a stock screen that should be of interest to thread viewers. This screenJerome-1/14/2001
4507Brian, i suspect u r right...semi equips are being accumulated. fundamentally,Henry D-1/13/2001
4506>Why would anyone want to hold a stock where the price target is 40% below thhui zhou-1/13/2001
4505I believe the whole sector is under accumulation. After the recent warnings frProud_Infidel-1/13/2001
4504Why would anyone want to hold a stock where the price target is 40% below the cuJerome-1/12/2001
4503Si is acting up again:-) Subject 50522Proud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4502These analysts have been proven soooo wrong this cycle. I for one would be surProud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4501These analysts have been proven soooo wrong this cycle. I for one would be surProud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4500These analysts have been proven soooo wrong this cycle. I for one would be surProud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4499These analysts have been proven soooo wrong this cycle. I for one would be surProud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4498<i>The price target was cut to $14 from $35</i> I find this to be Jerome-1/12/2001
4497Lam Research Cut to 'Hold' at Wells Fargo Van Kasper 1/12/01 9:23:00 AM Proud_Infidel-1/12/2001
4496You are right, the stock pricing data is 11/30 wile the mutual fund data 9/30. IJerome-1/12/2001
4495Jerome, Thanks for the link - I had found it at one time in the past, and then Donald Wennerstrom-1/12/2001
4494Brian, one tool that I use to determine probable trends is the following link foJerome-1/12/2001
4493Looks like a good deal for LRCX at a low price. I hope that most thread readers Jerome-1/10/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News