SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
NEOTHERAPEUTICS (NEOT) (NEOTW)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
705 5 0 NEOT
Emcee:  IGUANA Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
455 mm covered their shorts....now squeezing traders....then mm shorts more, then iPierre Borczuk-6/3/1998
454 What's up with this stock? RealMuLan-6/3/1998
453 Thanks for that post Lee ... David M. Evans-6/2/1998
452 Thread: FWIW News update from NEOT website-- neotherapeutics.com dtd 6/1/98Lee Fredrickson-6/2/1998
451 Thanks for your response. I understand that you are not making any negative comMarty-5/31/1998
450 The FDA does not care about anecdotes, whereas I do ( as a clinician, case sNeuroInvestment-5/30/1998
449 Dave, I know that the experiences with AIT-082 that were related by this man anMarty-5/30/1998
448 I'm not quite sure what this posting from Yahoo boards proves, disproves, oDavid M. Evans-5/30/1998
447 Thought you would be interested in the following post to the YAHOO thread with Marty-5/30/1998
446 Joe for those of us holding this stock over 1 week this is very high volume. Thjohn jansen-5/29/1998
445 NEOT is up on very low volume this morning. This is probably short covering anJoe Bz-5/29/1998
444 Thanks, Barb, It is great to have someone on the thread who can think, spell, aMarty-5/28/1998
443 >>>Since you know why the stock ran up, would let the rest of us know Mama Bear-5/28/1998
442 It appears that the financial community has really picked up a keen interest inslipnsip-5/28/1998
441 I haven't seen the WSJ article but the Los Angeles Times attributes the remMarty-5/28/1998
440 I guess all we need to do to find out who is right is to review the WSJ articleslipnsip-5/28/1998
439 Does it matter at all to you that your facts are wrong? It wasn't Dr. G. wMarty-5/28/1998
438 "I am curious though as to whether you would classify them as being in theslipnsip-5/28/1998
437 That's not my only beef but there is no sense pushing a string here. SinceMarty-5/27/1998
436 Barb you are one of 2 shorts i have any respect for. Do hope you are wrong on john jansen-5/27/1998
435 So basically you're only beef is that some think it was company sponsored? Mama Bear-5/27/1998
434 Re your "If there were serious deceptions coming from the short side, and Marty-5/27/1998
433 >>>I will always feel that shorting and other mainly derivative plays Mama Bear-5/27/1998
432 Barb: You make some good points. And, re: emotions vs. investing I think thatLee Fredrickson-5/27/1998
431 I hope you make some money - I have with this stock and will continue to do so,David M. Evans-5/27/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):