SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Kulicke and Soffa
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5482 91 0 KLIC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4557Scott, RE:"I feel you were blinded to the summer/fall downdraft in the secCary Salsberg-11/6/2000
4556Sam, it does not appear that you will get a chance to buy in at a much lower priJerome-11/6/2000
4555Comments from the CC, including Sue Billat... From the Yahoo thread messages.yascott_jiminez-11/6/2000
4554Ian, Ian, Ian. You should stick your head where the sun don't shine for sucscott_jiminez-11/6/2000
4553I'm not getting anything on the webcast so far. Are you? DDemosthenes-11/6/2000
4552The call doesn't start for another 13 minutes. It's 9PDT not EDT. GreaIan@SI-11/6/2000
4551Why thank you. BTW, you will find that virtually every 'boastful' word scott_jiminez-11/6/2000
4550I thought this was the KLIC board,not the Scott J. site. Perhaps you could take Dale Knipschield-11/6/2000
4549All things considered, a remarkably calm morning for Klic. I make a point of thscott_jiminez-11/6/2000
4548Cary, Where you see in my points of view confusion, failure to distinguish variscott_jiminez-11/6/2000
4547Scott, I am not sure we "disagree on issues." Regarding Jurgis: He,Cary Salsberg-11/5/2000
4546Sam, I have small buy orders in for EGLS at $12 and COHU at $10. I don't exCary Salsberg-11/5/2000
4545semi, sorry - don't have those numbers. I can get revenues etc 10 years backGottfried-11/5/2000
4544Admirable post, Sam. The cash flow link you provided in #4542 was through 1999scott_jiminez-11/5/2000
4543Gottfried, do you have a plot of KLIC booking/revenues? Rev-2000 180,222,268,14semi2000-11/5/2000
4542I don't know. KLIC's cash flow trends are not exactly encouraging. IhttpSam Citron-11/5/2000
4541>>Dust does not settle without the stock moving higher.<< Most KLICJerome-11/5/2000
4540<i>Why not wait until the dust settles for a few weeks prior to adding morSam Citron-11/5/2000
4539<i>I do not recall any "reckless proclamations" by SK.</i>Red Dragon-11/5/2000
4538RD, I want to go on record that these shareholder lawsuits are egregious and deProud_Infidel-11/5/2000
4537Jerome, good points ><i>what events or circumstances from this point onGottfried-11/5/2000
4536>>KLIC is probably in a buy range, now.<< Perhaps or perhaps not. WJerome-11/5/2000
4535Several points to make... First of all, it's nice not to be Scott's onlRed Dragon-11/5/2000
4534Cary - With the amount and doggerel and drivel (....for Brian to accuse me of scott_jiminez-11/5/2000
4533<i>KLIC is probably in a buy range, now.</i> In your opinion would Sam Citron-11/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News