SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Read-Rite
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5058 49 0 RDRT
Emcee:  Mark Fleming Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4558 The Negative Speculative Crap on Yahoo isn't helping. They are suggesting stockbug-2/5/1999
4557 RDRT has broken 13.5 bull support line...next stop 12.5, but who really knows!!FNS-2/5/1999
4556 The whole sector is being sold off. Kurlack and his usual hatred of INTEL hasstockbug-2/4/1999
4555 Stich: The stock 13 1/2 is sitting right on the bottom line of the longer termFNS-2/4/1999
4554 Marty, I don't think I would buy RDRT at this point. While they have manaStitch-2/4/1999
4553 Please ask her the questions you just asked me. I did not listen to the CC eithDennis R. Duke-2/4/1999
4552 Stitch, would you be a buyer of RDRT at this level? If i call Jane C, what shoCPAMarty-2/4/1999
4551 Hi Dennis i missed the last CC; what did they say about IBM/WDC and what about CPAMarty-2/4/1999
4550 Anybody home? I noticed that the last trade of the day was a 50,000 share buy Dennis R. Duke-2/3/1999
4549 The new analysis from Value Line is very positive and it upgrade RDRT from 3 toAlain Dubreuil-1/29/1999
4548 Hooray, sold this dog for not an awful beating, have been buying DELL and INTCCNC-1/29/1999
4547 Kick a guy when he is down, nice, very nice!!! Actually I am off by 15.09% righDennis R. Duke-1/29/1999
4546 Sheez, a strong market and we're down. I hope Dennis will sell half of his Wall Street Jr-1/29/1999
4545 <Fair observation and I will go a step further. I think to be truly healthy Mark Oliver-1/26/1999
4544 Mark, <i><<? I also worry that they rely too much on WDC and MaxtoStitch-1/26/1999
4543 Well I'm glad I was just watching BNYN. Looks like the street was not impreWall Street Jr-1/26/1999
4542 >><i>my guess is we cool off for awhile <<</i> Excepttom pope-1/26/1999
4541 It seems to me that for RDRT to be truly successful, they must get Quantum backMark Oliver-1/26/1999
4540 <i>I fear you were emotionally edged out too soon to recover your positioDennis R. Duke-1/26/1999
4539 Just starting to research this company, but ~ 50% revenues attributable to WDC,Alan Casey-1/26/1999
4538 Whatever the recent declines, they come after some monster moves. Surely that iSam-1/26/1999
4537 <i><<But perhaps an analyst looks like an idiot recommending a stocStitch-1/26/1999
4536 Dennis, Please note the drop is on relatively low volume...might even be healthLarry Glover-1/26/1999
4535 Dennis, I am just not sure what to say to you. I fear you were emotionally edgStitch-1/25/1999
4534 As positive as the earnings were I am surprised that RDRT is not getting some uDennis R. Duke-1/25/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):