SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Orbite Aluminae
An SI Board Since October 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6560 168 0 EORBF
Emcee:  Rex Havoc Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4560stockhouse.com The above reference from SH might be of interest in the case of altior-4/17/2013
4559absolutely agree Mark.....Detective-4/17/2013
4558Detective, True -- I can see the patents being worth $ to keep the technology OMark Bartlett14/17/2013
4557Lets remember the technology space and the value of the then defunct Nortel and Detective-4/17/2013
4556Southern X. Of course you are correct, but in all three cases the only road to Mark Bartlett-4/17/2013
4555Regarding the various patent families I can think of at least three ways in whicSouthern X14/16/2013
4554>> It's just presumption to believe that they need it specifically to Terry Maloney-4/16/2013
4553YesTerry. I didn't want to ignore the fact that they WILL need money. Itgegetrane-4/16/2013
4552On the regulatory front an interesting update at the link below.....moving slowlDetective-4/16/2013
4551There's a lot of noise out there. A patent is valuable if the process workverjam44/16/2013
4550pinotte was from March 28, 2013 orb1orb134/16/2013
4549\Business is Business, small, medium and large corporations " all" corDetective14/16/2013
4548From SH board, bad material news about delay and production. stockhouse.comPinotte-4/16/2013
4547The bottom line is that they seem to need money ... how soon, how much, and wherTerry Maloney-4/16/2013
4546Provided you come along for the ride, for the time being, that's fine with altior-4/16/2013
4545Maybe not naive, but people tend to do these calculations to make themselves feeShortbus24/16/2013
4544No. That's not what I'm saying. I am saying that Orbite will face hurdNos Da-4/16/2013
4543altior, he's not saying they WON'T be overcome. He's saying that wegegetrane-4/16/2013
4542To assume that they (i.e. host of hurdles) will be overcome is naive. Unless Ialtior-4/16/2013
4541The background is likely to back up Mark's approach. The article published ialtior-4/16/2013
4540I have not equated delay with failure at any point in this discussion. Plus, yNos Da-4/16/2013
4539kidl, The other reality is -- everything that is not letter perfect will be deeMark Bartlett14/16/2013
4538altior, If the patents are NOT able to be monetized then they are not worth anyMark Bartlett-4/16/2013
4537I have no opinion on the lien issue. I just said it isn’t the kind of PR any pubkidl-4/16/2013
4536Agree :)Nos Da-4/16/2013
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News