SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums
Silicon Investor - New feature discussion
An SI Board Since July 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7391 326 0
Emcee:  SI Dmitry (code monkey) Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4586Thanks for the compromise. Believe you have satisfied many, new and old versioRaptech19/17/2014
4585What is the link to the classic version? TIA Classic subjectmarks page up and Justin C-9/17/2014
4584Are you thinking of un-Banning those who objected?Sr K69/17/2014
4583Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!! Blessings, SOJSweet Ol-9/17/2014
4582Yes, I see it. Much, much better.JohnM-9/17/2014
4581Classic subjectmarks page up and running. Thanks, Dmitry.ACAN-9/17/2014
4580Thanks. Let's hope you're right.JohnM-9/17/2014
4579Awesome update Dmitry. I actually like the new with the new message count in thBob-9/17/2014
4578Dear New Feature Discussion participants, An update to the SI focusing on revisSI Dmitry (code monkey)299/17/2014
4577John, sounds like it is in the works being tested right now Message 29717649ACAN-9/17/2014
4576Let me join my SI colleagues who request that we have the option of using the olJohnM79/17/2014
4575I know you have your hands full, so this is a request which is likely already onThe Ox-9/17/2014
4574Dear Tapcon, A site update that includes a number of fixes and updates as well SI Dmitry (code monkey)79/17/2014
4573I'm in accord with the nearly universal frustration re the subjectmarks and Tapcon29/17/2014
4572It's taken me two days to try out all the features and I think it just takesN. Dixon-9/16/2014
4571The old format was much simpler and cleaner. To put it plainly, I do not like tCatfish179/16/2014
4570@Dima, please go back to the old subject marks page. the new page is not as simpInvestor Clouseau79/16/2014
4569Dear Elroy, It has been explained by myself and others to you several times. YSI Dmitry (code monkey)19/16/2014
4568Careful how you ask.. ..they can, and do delete at will ..beats answering unanMetacomet49/16/2014
4567I've asked a few times Why are you thinking that SI users want to look at SElroy119/16/2014
4566This is a valid point, that when the read or unread counts are low, the look canQuahog89/16/2014
4565It's also frustrating when I just read your post in a list of many messages The Ox29/16/2014
4564In case you missed this elaboration Thanks for the suggestions. Kirk's ideaKirk ©19/16/2014
4563well, there is SOME utility if you moderate or post regular content to a handfulKirk ©19/16/2014
4562>> and that can't be avoided, as we need to reset the count to displaTerry Maloney-9/16/2014
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):