SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
459 Jeff, <<The stakes are huge here, and they already blew the lead they haFred Fahmy-3/1/1997
458 COMS may see its second dead cat bounce this week but this time it will only rThe BayWatcher-3/1/1997
457 James, Although there is a pretty sizeable breakup penalty, it's not too mDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
456 All: From an inside prospective, many market particpants *DO NOT WANT TO SEE TSteve Wiz-3/1/1997
455 Mike: don't know about opening. As was said previously, there is a strong gonzongo-3/1/1997
454 Would anyone care to share thoughts on MONDAY'S opening price? Could make Michael Shumberger-3/1/1997
453 David, Why do you expect competitive offer for USRX???James Young-3/1/1997
452 good analysis Andie- i think I will follow suit and go long on monday. yt andgonzongo-3/1/1997
451 <<Seemed as though USR was light years ahead but they dropped the ball byWigglesworth-3/1/1997
450 Ther was an article in Business week today on the 56k modems. Just a brief paraJeff Sheeran-3/1/1997
449 I go through the list of upgradable choices and do not see one for my SportsterCrotty-3/1/1997
448 New to COMS went long the other day and looking to pick up more next week. WithReseller-3/1/1997
447 Yeah, this makes good sense. And add to that the fact that the most conservativAlan Belkin-3/1/1997
446 <<or goes down to about high 10s>> Oh boy, you are in for some criPaul Reuben-3/1/1997
445 COMS has reached critical point right now. Technically speaking, it either holdlin luo-3/1/1997
444 Yup that's what I did, but it's no fun when you can't post. Maybe Scrapps-3/1/1997
443 The SI server was down. You could read through the exchange2000 server, but youDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
442 Sunny, Both USRX an COMS have done their due dilligence before entering into tDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
441 SOME upgrades here.................. x2.usr.comScrapps-3/1/1997
440 Andie - What's your technical pattern on USRX look like? Thanks in advance.James Young-3/1/1997
439 What...huh? Where is everyone today? No posts since 7:32 am.Scrapps-3/1/1997
438 John, >Why would both stocks get whacked if the merger does not go through?Hassell Anderson-3/1/1997
437 Damnitt son, lay off the whiskey and let that cocaine be!!Eric Prigge-3/1/1997
436 Mr. Dodge, Barring any unforseen calamities, I think you are dead on target heEric Prigge-3/1/1997
435 is PCtel a publicly trading company? where can I get more info?? Thank you for sri kottapally-3/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):