SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discuss Go2Net's acquisition of our beloved SI
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
446 20 0
Emcee:  purecntry5 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
46 Congratulation Brad! It has been great watching this site grow, and playing thE. Taylor-4/23/1998
45 Congratulations to the three new millionaires - on paper, anyway. As a few otheTerry D-4/23/1998
44 brad-- i dont think anyone would begrudge you for wanting to make some money oTrey McAtee-4/23/1998
43 Hi Freeus, NOT flying around(as in twister) is probably one of the reasons theAnn Corrigan-4/23/1998
42 Hi Rick, Welcome to the greatest financial chat and information site in the worfreeus-4/23/1998
41 <i>>>Not bad? Sounds like enough to fund the SI owners for the restDavid Lawrence-4/23/1998
40 Brad: I have loved the improvements and have several times e mailed my thanks freeus-4/23/1998
39 Oh Scott you are a tough one! I agree that lifetime subscriptions should be honfreeus-4/23/1998
38 re <i> hope you folks made out like bandits</i> I saw on the Yahoo freeus-4/23/1998
37 Hello James, Re <i> So do we buy GNET</i> I sold a stock (at a lossfreeus-4/23/1998
36 Brad, Jeff, Jill: Cheeky Kid-4/23/1998
35 Hi Brad, Congratulations to you & your brother on today's announcementAnn Corrigan-4/23/1998
34 >>$33 million - not bad, but it's probably restricted.<< Not bBrendan2012-4/23/1998
33 Greg M wrote: "What a fiendishly clever way to profit from the internet! Richard Ruscio-4/23/1998
32 RE: <i>If someone flashed an "almost instant" 33 million you wIMPRISTlNE-4/23/1998
31 Taking the bird in the hand is a valid point. But when can these guys actuallypeter michaelson-4/23/1998
30 If someone flashed an "almost instant" 33 million you would do the sapurecntry5-4/23/1998
29 Can't really see the turning off of banner adds for subscribers as workableIPOJunkie-4/23/1998
28 Brad: Get real, man. You will no longer control SI. I would back out of thispeter michaelson-4/23/1998
27 <i>What a fiendishly clever way to profit from the internet! Swamp peopleScott Pedigo-4/23/1998
26 I think Wyatt Earp ran 'em out of town. #reply-4000000David Lawrence-4/23/1998
25 I guess the Kansas coffee just didn't cut it.Jacques Chitte-4/23/1998
24 >>The non-subscribers should have to endure a moderate number of banner aSnowshoe-4/23/1998
23 Brad: Congrads ... always good to see hard effort rewarded! The following makrlev-4/23/1998
22 Owl, I think your logic is fair enough. Although GNET is a good and promising White Shoes-4/23/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):