SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
What Number Am I Thinking Of?
An SI Board Since August 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
710 9 0
Emcee:  Quahog Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
460I'm glad to get all these 2 digit numbers out of the way. 26 is not the rigQuahog8/21/2001
459Prize? Who said anything about a prize? <ggg> Well....maybe I have an olQuahog8/21/2001
458I don't know.... Quahogs are mighty cute.....and tasty! 563 is not the numbQuahog8/21/2001
457Sorry, not 799 either. I like your sticktoitiveness, though.lQuahog8/21/2001
456That's as good a reason as any, I suppose, to pick a number. It would be grQuahog8/21/2001
455Wow! 272 is one fine guess, but not fine enough. Good try.Quahog8/21/2001
454Not 18 either, but good try.Quahog8/21/2001
453Nope, not xyz.Quahog8/21/2001
452Although I am having a hard time forgiving you for saying that my alias is not aQuahog8/21/2001
451With the benefit of hindsight, I have decided that I owe you an apology for thaQuahog8/21/2001
450Okay, I'm with you, but have you noticed His Hogness is developing an attitusandintoes8/21/2001
449sandintoes: look, the original post has this addition: <i>555 (so there!Karen Lawrence8/21/2001
448It is very important to be ourselves. So it is as bad as <B>YOU</B>sandintoes8/20/2001
447<i>I'm rather partial to bad witches.</i> ALL RIGHT! I'll bLazarus_Long8/20/2001
446I didn't think of that...only here for the grub! She used us! I'm suresandintoes8/20/2001
445sandintoes: 563 Did you see that! Catlady scooped the 444 grub, that being the Karen Lawrence8/20/2001
444444 has been guessed already, but I'll grub it anyhow.CatLady8/20/2001
44318! She may not know about the lack of an update for a while. Sorry about the sandintoes8/20/2001
442I'm rather partial to bad witches. Are we suppose to be guessing numbers hesandintoes8/20/2001
441LOL..HaHaHa..you think you're original? I've had suggestions that I hadsandintoes8/20/2001
440sandintoes: 799 No, not a lawyer. I think we should stop insulting each other. lKaren Lawrence8/20/2001
439Which witch do you wich?Lazarus_Long8/20/2001
438ONLY 885 NUMBERS LEFT! ACT NOW! Therefore, I guess 885.CatLady8/20/2001
437Are you sure the sand is only in your toes? <gg?> <ggg>Quahog8/20/2001
436While Roadhog is resting his case, I will attempt to explain his mumbo jumbo, ansandintoes8/20/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News