SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Data Broadcasting Corp. (DBCC)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5102 22 0 DBCC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4602 stay with me and we will both be rich! dbcc to 50 fossilg-2/2/1999
4601 fossilg, What just happened with DBCC- it just shot "north" like a roDouglas V. Fant-2/2/1999
4600 earning out the 11th, this will pop,i,m looking for@big one.fossilg-2/2/1999
4599 <i> but only you attacked and told him to stop posting </i> I haveRajiv-2/2/1999
4598 I think we will see DBCC < 15. I covered only a part of my original IPO shorRajiv-2/2/1999
4597 Spare us the sanctimonious crap. You attacked the guy for asking a question. SHGLaw-2/2/1999
4596 Rajiv, a recap of the recent DBCC/MKTW pricing shows that DBCC is still too stRockyBalboa-2/2/1999
4595 Alan: I sold at $36. Shorted at about $28 average. Intend to cover at $14 orpeter michaelson-2/2/1999
4594 Peter, At what price did you short DBCC? At what price will you cover? At whAlan C. Zezula-2/2/1999
4593 Guys, I may be unwise to interfere, here, but please let's lay off the perspeter michaelson-2/1/1999
4592 <i> Forget about people like Rajiv. Post anything that they can even remoRajiv-2/1/1999
4591 DBCC competitor DTLN completes $123 mil financing...conflict of interest? <esecurities(tm)-2/1/1999
4590 Forget about people like Rajiv. Post anything that they can even remotely percSHGLaw-2/1/1999
4589 Sorry, zurdo. My response should have been directed to Rajiv (4581)jim geis-2/1/1999
4588 jim, I never thought you were posting false info...I've done the same thingzurdo-2/1/1999
4587 My source is one who does not know as much as he thinks he knows and that is whjim geis-2/1/1999
4586 BTW, I haven't heard anything about ATT being involved either. Just donSHGLaw-2/1/1999
4585 I work as a consultant for AT&T (Disclaimer - I am not an insider). I know Rajiv-2/1/1999
4584 Jim, I have heard nothing about AT&T/TCI having a position in DBCC...Can yozurdo-2/1/1999
4583 Rajiv: <<This is absolutely incorrect. Please stop posting misleading inSHGLaw-2/1/1999
4582 >>DBCC:In Perspective...AMTD...EGRP... (NASDAQ:AMTD) quote.yahoo.com DBesecurities(tm)-2/1/1999
4581 <i> Talked to someone this weekend who swears that AT&T/TCI has a posRajiv-2/1/1999
4580 Talked to someone this weekend who swears that AT&T/TCI has a position in jim geis-2/1/1999
4579 I do not see what positive effect a Schwab margin increase to 70% will have on zurdo-2/1/1999
4578 This may have a positive effect on DBCC next week, along with a number of otherCapt-1/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News