SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INFORMATION ANALYSIS (IAIC) - YEAR 2000 Date Remediation
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2011 8 0 IAIC
Emcee:  Michael Sturm Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
461 good luck to you then, hope you can hold the stock till 2000! wasn't it traTom Lu-4/24/1997
460 When you first entered this forum (which I think was March 19 more or less) tMatthew F. Kern-4/24/1997
459 Looks like the momentum is gone from this stock. A test of 15 may be likely in stockvalinvestor-4/24/1997
458 Matt, You know how happy I am, and I know how sad you are, as I said in the laTom Lu-4/24/1997
457 Matthew, Elliot , and a few others: Hi I have really appreciated your posts oveDavid Cutter-4/24/1997
456 More Tom Lu "wisdom?" This stock has not apreciably gone down, and Matthew F. Kern-4/23/1997
455 The only thing holding back this stock is the listing on nasdaq; at that point SirAlexx-4/23/1997
454 History is only repeating at punishing those "irrational", more than Tom Lu-4/23/1997
453 All they can do is delay the inevitable. When the effects of the CA deal hit Matthew F. Kern-4/23/1997
452 I wish I had the technology to back this up, but I think what we saw today was ThirdEye-4/22/1997
451 'Just sat there. ....wierd. ....just wierd. I have no idea what earningsMatthew F. Kern-4/22/1997
450 Lots of trading-no price action. Puzzling. Maybe MMs are passing shares back anThirdEye-4/22/1997
449 A post from AOL: Subj: Re:Info on IAIC needed Date: 97-04-22 00:46:19 EDT Frstockvalinvestor-4/22/1997
448 According to the company, they filed with the NASD for a listing when they relstockvalinvestor-4/22/1997
447 Oh really? When did the company file with the SEC and NASD? PeterPierre Mondieu-4/22/1997
446 Delayed price of 24x25 or 72x75 pre-split. So about a 5 point pop pre-split rigstockvalinvestor-4/22/1997
445 Higher, much higher... The momentum from yesterday should continue, and new higeugenic1-4/22/1997
444 Gary, Kenneth, Roger, etc.: Any predictions for today?Matthew F. Kern-4/22/1997
443 I am not certain what you were driving at with this: "CAST is a toolset uMatthew F. Kern-4/22/1997
442 Kenneth: Check out MVSI and the MVSI thread. Think you will like what is about Instock-4/22/1997
441 Interesting. WebBroker didn't find it when I tried. I was under the impreJohn E. Bentley-4/21/1997
440 The last couple weeks have been a roller coaster ride with IAIC. I had almost MILK MAN-4/21/1997
439 I think we are past the Barrons article and, as I pointed out in my post(410), ctirry-4/21/1997
438 what an incredible reversal today! I think this bodes well, but I don't thiThirdEye-4/21/1997
437 Good call, Kenneth. I was lucky enough to get in at 62 today. It should be inChris Belk-4/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):