SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Neocon's Seminar Thread
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1112 21 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
462Looking forward to it! Thanks, you too.gao seng-4/27/2001
461I have to get going. Maybe, if I feel up to it, I will put up some post- HegeliaNeocon-4/27/2001
460There is a lot more development than one may realize, yes, although it is not unNeocon-4/27/2001
459what is, how to know what is, and how to live in accord with what is -- ontologgao seng-4/27/2001
458LOL! Exploit away........but remember, there is more to come........Neocon-4/27/2001
457Good night. But do not expect a response from me too soon. I have a lot of worgao seng-4/27/2001
456Time to turn in. See you tomorrow......Neocon-4/27/2001
455It is another image for explaining our situation......Neocon-4/27/2001
454Wow. i have only read the first two sentences and all I can say is I am flabbergao seng-4/27/2001
453Okay, I have a second wind to note some of the problems with the article on episNeocon-4/27/2001
452I have always had a soft spot for that song.<g>.....Neocon-4/26/2001
451For being at the bottom of a cycle you sure do shine. I am sure you know thisgao seng-4/26/2001
450Thanks, I just have hit some kind of trough, and need to relax a bit....Neocon-4/26/2001
449Lol! I will let you go then. Again, thanks. Look forward to your review of thgao seng-4/26/2001
448I reviewed the whole post on epistemology carefully. It is not bad, though it isNeocon-4/26/2001
447Thanks......I will try to see the program..... The retort is better argued in tNeocon-4/26/2001
446Here is the post the author responded to, and the Shapiro post the author referegao seng-4/26/2001
445I am sure he is the rage, because he provides an agnostic grounding for ethics. Neocon-4/26/2001
444Thanks for your many wonderful responses. My perceptions of the universe are qugao seng-4/26/2001
443Since there is a lot in the post, I will get back to it in detail later. What KaNeocon-4/26/2001
442Thanks. This philosophy stuff gets pretty deep. So Kant opened the door for Magao seng-4/26/2001
441It is probably accurate. The idea of the moral argument is to provide a frameworNeocon-4/26/2001
440"The moral argument does not claim to supply knowledge but merely faith.&qgao seng-4/26/2001
439Actually, the characterization of Kant is inaccurate. Kant held that we obey theNeocon-4/26/2001
438I agree with the usage. Without spirituality (The belief that we have an eternagao seng-4/26/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):