SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi Equipment Analysis
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
96268 488 0 SOXX
Emcee:  Return to Sender Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4621<i>The majority of these companies will end up on the OTC BB, some on the SusieQ1065-8/4/2002
4620Then why are some of the "Anticipated Report Due Dates" listed as 9/15BWAC-8/4/2002
4619RtS, thanks for the criteria. I saved them for now. [end]Gottfried-8/4/2002
4618>> Nasdaq may be lenient right now. Price under $1 for 30 days. But thereSarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4617To stay listed on the NASDAQ a stock must have a minimum price over a dollar at Return to Sender-8/4/2002
4616RtS, Nasdaq technology between $0.01 and $1.00... 303 stocks. Thanks for pointGottfried-8/4/2002
4615Brian, Stockcharts has a list of adjustments. Glancing at it I see these reverseGottfried-8/4/2002
4614Actually, NASDAQ is too young to accurately plot over a longer time frame than wSirRealist-8/4/2002
4613Sarmad, action item sounds fine. What exactly are the Nasdaq delisting criteria.Gottfried-8/4/2002
4612RtS and Gottfried, I used the link (thanks, RtS). The number of companies on alSarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4611It appears MSTR did a reverse split: quote.yahoo.com $333 to 50 cents has to bProud_Infidel-8/4/2002
4610the other 353 INKP Inkine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 0.8 0.82 0.78 0.8 43200 Gottfried-8/4/2002
4609653 Nasdaq stocks under $1 Friday [volume ma >40,000] I'll post 300 here,Gottfried-8/4/2002
4608The majority of these companies will end up on the OTC BB, some on the pink sheeReturn to Sender-8/4/2002
4607Gottfried, why the restriction for volume ? We just want to know how many companSarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4606>> 585 NASDAQ stocks at $1 or less. Thanks, RtS. And there must be a couSarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4605Great! I'll have my results soon. [end]Gottfried-8/4/2002
4604Sarmad, scanned all US stocks for those closing under $1.00 with daily volume maGottfried-8/4/2002
4603585 NASDAQ stocks at $1 or less. I used the stock screener here at Silicon InvesReturn to Sender-8/4/2002
4602Sarmad, ><i>How about a scan of stocks selling under a dollar</i>Gottfried-8/4/2002
4601duplicateGottfried-8/4/2002
4600>> GTIX last sold for 2/10 of a penny. Gottfried, How about a scan of sSarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4599>> "There's a bad odor surrounding these analysts," said RoySarmad Y. Hermiz-8/4/2002
4598Brian, scanned for Nasdaq stocks having a bullish 50 day/200 day ma cross. FoundGottfried-8/4/2002
4597"There's a bad odor surrounding these analysts," said Roy Weitz, Proud_Infidel-8/4/2002
4596Re<i> if we use that calculation, NASDAQ would hit 230! Don't worry boProud_Infidel-8/4/2002
4595SR, thanks for the explanation. I see you're almost convinced ><i>IGottfried-8/4/2002
4594Naw, more like 2850ish. On a 75 year timeline, I could make a case for 420 thouSirRealist-8/4/2002
4593Just draw the downtrend channel line to 2004 and the projected bottom line interSirRealist-8/4/2002
4592So what are you predicting? 500 for the Nasdaq?Proud_Infidel-8/4/2002
4591Amateur Investors Weekend Analysis: amateur-investors.com Well worth reading. Return to Sender-8/4/2002
4590Uh, nope. Ian was closer to being right than you are. Please reread my post and Return to Sender-8/4/2002
4589RTS, Aug 14. I think you misunderstand. All reports filed with the SEC after AuBWAC-8/4/2002
4588InvestmentHouse Weekend Update: investmenthouse.com - Indexes lose footing on Return to Sender-8/4/2002
4587This is the same data sorted by PCF. 8/2/02 CLOSE PRESENT SYMBOL PRICE Donald Wennerstrom-8/4/2002
4586This is the same data sorted by PBR. 8/2/02 CLOSE PRESENT SYMBOL PRICE Donald Wennerstrom-8/4/2002
4585Based on Friday's closing prices and the latest 12 month data on companies Donald Wennerstrom-8/4/2002
4584Don't blame you for using a free site if you have it. Discussions are free,Kirk ©-8/4/2002
4583Interesting article. Too bad they couldn't get Fred Hickey's name spelleAlastair McIntosh-8/4/2002
4582Sir Realist, I see you project the Nas bottom as the level in 1991. What is yourGottfried-8/4/2002
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News