SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
464 I heard that Soundview downgraded the stock because they think APLX will have sEric-11/7/1996
463 Hi all, Wondering if the general perception is that this decline is just anothedeveloper-11/7/1996
462 Craig, I covered my short position in AM, volatility related to unstitutional mMagnifique-10/31/1996
461 a good trading stock.Eric-10/31/1996
460 In at 22 7/8. Should be good for 26 - 27 in short termPeter R Smith-10/31/1996
459 Magnifique, >we are scratching long term bottom I certainly hope that you GuinnessGuy-10/30/1996
458 Robert, APLX always was subject to heavy manipulation before and after earningsMagnifique-10/30/1996
457 Greg, if it means something, it,s already in price, besides do you think that SMagnifique-10/30/1996
456 Magnifique: What concerns me about the drop this time, if you look at Telechargreg dietz-10/30/1996
455 Magnifique: do you think that this particularly harsh selloff (I warned about Robert K. Schott-10/29/1996
454 Dear Vineet, I have no doubts APLX will come back, fundamentally company strongMagnifique-10/28/1996
453 Hello, what do you think the prospects of APLX are. It closed at 26 1/4 on FriVineet K. Gupta-10/27/1996
452 Robert as difficult as it is to believe APLX pattern repeats itself quater afteMagnifique-10/27/1996
451 Magnifique: the stock's action is still somewhat puzzling to me. it is siRobert K. Schott-10/24/1996
450 chijow: the term "high PE" is a relative one. we apparently disagreRobert K. Schott-10/24/1996
449 Robert! You asked the question, and gave perfect answer in the last line. MarkeMagnifique-10/24/1996
448 For this high PE, a rate 'hold' should be considered as 'sell'.chijow shein-10/24/1996
447 although I find Soundview's downgrade incomprehensible, for those of you SoRobert K. Schott-10/23/1996
446 To all concerned: Dear Eric, Paul, and Robert, I completely agree that the moMagnifique-10/20/1996
445 I was right!! we did finally make NBR! I can't honestly say that I watch Robert K. Schott-10/19/1996
444 can what I read this afternoon possibly be true??? Applix beats Soundview FiRobert K. Schott-10/18/1996
443 Seems like A BIT of an over-reaction today. As was said b4, stock doubled overdeveloper-10/18/1996
442 APLX gets hit again, glad I sold currently trading at 33 1/2 hahahahahPeter R Smith-10/18/1996
441 Magnifique, the stock went from 20 to 40 in a month, that is double. there are Eric-10/17/1996
440 Dear Craig, news extremly positive, because their new partner is a leader in itMagnifique-10/17/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):