SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CustomTracks Corporation (CUST)
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2514 13 0 CUST
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
464 <i>Russian roulette is not my style. </i> Good point Mike, neitherTom Hua-5/29/1999
463 There are similarities, Tom, and there are differences. If I were you, and I aMike M-5/29/1999
462 <i>...And why?</i> What and why I always pay ...Someone who has dMike M-5/29/1999
461 good point...I agree this is very speculative...for those of us who got in earlevy-5/29/1999
460 Mike, just two simple questions: What where you paying for, when you where buyShtirlitz-5/29/1999
459 Jon, I think net stocks will rebound some then the selloff continues into the sTom Hua-5/28/1999
458 <i>, even if you were right, it took ZITL 4 years and a significant amounTom Hua-5/28/1999
457 Tom, looks like you had a lots of fun with CUST and PCLN while I was gone.;o) Jon K.-5/28/1999
456 <i>CUST: What makes you think that those insiders where not shorting in tMike M-5/28/1999
455 <i>You were comfortable being long when the stock was in the 80s ?</i&Mike M-5/28/1999
454 <i>Mike, ZITL, DNA, GKI fit exactly what you just described of CUST... Mike M-5/28/1999
453 CUST--i lightened my short position today in cust...made 29 pts on the downsidecoachbobknight-5/28/1999
452 Thanks for the example (CDN v AVNT). But I try not to base my investment decisJohn S. Baker-5/28/1999
451 <i> I would not be comfortable short.... </i> You were comfortableRajiv-5/28/1999
450 <i> but did these other firms have a man on the top with a reputation likRajiv-5/28/1999
449 Yep, just keep thinking that way, keep up the great posts, and short more. We bob yahnke-5/28/1999
448 <<CUST's competitors file 189 insider sells and CUST's files 18 iShtirlitz-5/28/1999
447 <<Shtirlitz, don't jump to a conclusion, who stole from whom is yet tShtirlitz-5/28/1999
446 <i>CUST's competitors </i> Bob, CUST has no products, no revenTom Hua-5/28/1999
445 CUST's competitors file 189 insider sells and CUST's files 18 insider bbob yahnke-5/28/1999
444 <i>And now it turns out that even their product, which has to be seen yetTom Hua-5/28/1999
443 <i>Perhaps simplistic?</i> John, or perhaps naive. Let me introduTom Hua-5/28/1999
442 <i>but did these other firms have a man on the top with a reputation likeTom Hua-5/28/1999
441 Again IANAL, but CUST's news release contains allegations of violating a coJohn S. Baker-5/28/1999
440 but did these other firms have a man on the top with a reputation like Mr Cook?levy-5/28/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):