SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4685Good idea. Solid, honest character from the Heartland. It would be good for him.Carolyn-12/4/2000
4684Y just represents different justification other than X. It would have been bettjttmab-12/4/2000
4683This court would have probably ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that a classTraderGreg-12/4/2000
4682Perhaps he should come up here to the mid-west. We are much better at sorting tOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4681Whoa, how does the same justification Y support A or B, but justification Y can TraderGreg-12/4/2000
4680Amen to that...btw, you mentioned you had a lot of sub duty...ssbn? out of whereTraderGreg-12/4/2000
4679<i>Your 33% is extraordinary. </i> That is what blew me away! I meOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4678I fully understand the merits of both sides. I just happen to think your sideOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4677Brit Hume just reported on Fox that Boies tries out his arguments on the liberalCarolyn-12/4/2000
4676Wow. At least I got 42% right. Almost as good as random guessing. Your 33% is The Philosopher-12/4/2000
4675<i>I would propose that if we all sat down for a beer that we would all agjttmab-12/4/2000
4674I don't think it's an automatic review.The Philosopher-12/4/2000
4673In point of fact, the Fla. Supreme did engage in an analysis of the Election Cocarranza2-12/4/2000
4672I consider myself an environmentalist with my land and the land I lease, but I fOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4671While the decision was a surprise to me; I suppose, in retrospect, it shouldnjttmab-12/4/2000
4670<i>A moderate liberal agreeing with a moderate conservative</i> My Oral Roberts-12/4/2000
4669How ironic that the Nine Justices of the Supreme Court are probably the only peoTraderGreg-12/4/2000
4668Head for cover! I was not familiar either, but tried to guess by the way The ThiCarolyn-12/4/2000
4667Interesting quiz. I missed 5. You could play that game using Mother Theresa anTraderGreg-12/4/2000
4666"remand" results in the re-writing of the rationale of the opinion in jttmab-12/4/2000
4665Any of those terms + the word "remand" would have the same effect, I bBill-12/4/2000
4664Thanks Jeff. A moderate liberal agreeing with a moderate conservative. What'jttmab-12/4/2000
4663I took the test knowing that I would not know who wrote what. I try not to readOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4662One of the lawyers on one of my readings today said exactly that. They are not Oral Roberts-12/4/2000
4661I missed 4. But that is scary indeed.Carolyn-12/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):