SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ISSM
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5211 10 0 ISSM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4686 Hi Henry; you are exactly right imo. The big boys would have been all over thiBrander-6/11/1997
4685 There is an article in today's WSJ concerning the problems of Israeli tech David Bogdanoff-6/10/1997
4684 hi craig hadn't seen you around here in ages... wish i had paid better atteSONAR-6/10/1997
4683 >that the problem was strictly business related as opposed to being a techniSONAR-6/10/1997
4682 Joe, Thanks for the post. This been my feeling all along, that the problem wasCatfish-6/10/1997
4681 Per Lisa Gelinas, two gentlemen from Israel, Bob Terry and a US corporation in Joe Krieger-6/10/1997
4680 Have you heard anything about the supposed meeting in Florida with the company shannon-6/10/1997
4679 What I have learned is if there are a large number of posts on a bulletin boardmajaman1978-6/10/1997
4678 David, First, before you produce something in a mass quantity, you must know whCatfish-6/9/1997
4677 I hope you are right in your analysis concerning perfecting mass production. BDavid Bogdanoff-6/9/1997
4676 David, The problem of mass production with GAD was probably due to restricted fCatfish-6/9/1997
4675 Stephan I don't think ISSM/GAD's problem is any generic problem with dDennis G.-6/9/1997
4674 Darrell; If they give up manufacturing and simply license the technology , of cDavid Bogdanoff-6/9/1997
4673 David, The production in the US will be cheaper to ISSM IF they can get somethiCatfish-6/8/1997
4672 To all; I have a problem with the idea that production is cheaper in the US thaDavid Bogdanoff-6/8/1997
4671 Can someone comment on the fact that it would be cheaper in the US? . They Step1-6/8/1997
4670 Good point Cathi. Bob T can't just spontaneously dump his shares--too bad Brander-6/6/1997
4669 Craig, you have obviously pointed out important facts which ISSM/GAD will have Dennis G.-6/6/1997
4668 Loren: I am sure Bob Terry does own a lot of ISSM stock.....through Lema, if nCathi Wierzbicki-6/6/1997
4667 Very interesting point Craig. By the way, you pointed out way back that thingsBrander-6/6/1997
4666 I apologise to you and others if I jumped the gun on criticising others for &quLoren S.-6/6/1997
4665 Dennis, you wrote: <i>They have apparently decided that their best coursGuinnessGuy-6/6/1997
4664 Cathi, I couldn't resist. I'm am back in. I am "gambling" thCatfish-6/6/1997
4663 Mark: I don't really know whether there has been large amounts of buying. Cathi Wierzbicki-6/6/1997
4662 Why has there been large amounts of buying on this thing in your opinion? Thismajaman1978-6/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):