SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Jonathan Lebed, 14 Year Old Boy Fined 1/4 Million by SEC
An SI Board Since September 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
172 15 0
Emcee:  Sword Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
47This is turning into an old FAMH family reunion.JEB-9/21/2000
46Tastes like Chicken -- Just some good ole fashioned sarcasm. I don't reallBRA-9/21/2000
45Hi TLC, Perhaps this is where the idea for a pump 'n dump first started to EL KABONG!!!-9/21/2000
44<i>Just go to the FAMH board,go back and read all of his posts.This whole Follies-9/21/2000
43That's brilliant. Put the people that don't break the law in jail and thDon Pueblo-9/21/2000
42To All-Just go to the FAMH board,go back and read all of his posts.This whole thMiriamsSon-9/21/2000
41CNN is going to have a feature on Young Jon in about 5 minutes...Don Pueblo-9/21/2000
40Does anyone have an example of a specific post of Jonathan that the SEC objectedFollies-9/21/2000
39<i>I think that those who were defrauded should have had a say in the puniFollies-9/21/2000
38<i>Aren't they the true criminals for not doing any of their own due dPatiBob-9/21/2000
37For those of you debating about whether or not he did anything wrong, let me redBRA-9/21/2000
36Hey wow, its good to see some old names! I havent been posting much on SI for aMark[ox5]-9/21/2000
35Long time no see. Yes, I am still chugging along... funny, I'm still allowedLittle Engine-9/21/2000
34The kid is my hero. eommarketmover-9/21/2000
33Little Engine, are you the same guy from the FAMH days?? If so is this the same Mark[ox5]-9/21/2000
32So perhaps his crime was making statements rather than opinions. I guess ML ond scott bradley-9/21/2000
31Thats what I believed happened. It's at the SEC's discression. He will art slott-9/21/2000
30I think that those who were defrauded should have had a say in the punishment.art slott-9/21/2000
29So he was charged with criminal fraud, and he pled out to civil fraud?donjuan_demarco-9/21/2000
28He was charged. The SEC settled. eomart slott-9/21/2000
27Based upon what I have read, he was not charged with any crimes, just civil fraudonjuan_demarco-9/21/2000
26Actually it was worse than Emulex imo from the standpoint that it was carried onart slott-9/21/2000
25He certainly is not the only person to front-run a stock on this website. If I Mike 2.0-9/21/2000
24He got off EASY. 15k fine. eomart slott-9/21/2000
23Actually he and other manipulators should spend a little time in a Federal PrisoPaul Kern-9/21/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):