SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IMON - Quoted from Barron's Corporate Reports
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2220 10 0 IMON
Emcee:  Mr. Rhino Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
470 Jeff, I'd like to thank you for your post. It was very informative and facJon K.-1/18/1999
469 I totally agree - Web Zinger 6.0 could be a HIT. Their designers hit the nail oGT-1/18/1999
468 I couldn't agree with you more Steven Finkel-1/18/1999
467 A@P & Count, Would you two please take the pissing contest private? If IKonKilo-1/18/1999
466 Jeff - Wasn't there some mention of a relationship or connection with IntelDavid Meyer-1/18/1999
465 Jeff, Thanks for the thoughtful, informed post. >>>I'm a prograKonKilo-1/18/1999
464 OOOOPS....I apologize about an incorrect statement on my last post...I am curreEd Swanson-1/18/1999
463 Well with all thats been said Tuesday will certainly be interesting. I think YoSqually-1/18/1999
462 So who is short????Nobody??? Give me a break. I will list all my holdings I do Ed Swanson-1/18/1999
461 Downloaded the beta 6. It's a larger program than its predecessor (around Louis Cornell-1/18/1999
460 no problem, ed: I am long. I am not trying to hide this from anyone. To me it Steven Finkel-1/18/1999
459 What I was laughing at was the rationalization of this guys actions. He would lEd Swanson-1/18/1999
458 Terp - I agree - IMON will be big. All this bantering about this weeks stock prGT-1/18/1999
457 Ed: Is it really necessary to post the same message twice? We get your point, aSteven Finkel-1/18/1999
456 "Who would use another search engine if there was a search engine that offLonnie-1/18/1999
455 If IMON has exclusive agreements, or just any agreements with the search engineT-Lo Greens-1/18/1999
454 Yep, thats why I bought in, because of the JAVA. Thats it. Kathy Riley-1/18/1999
453 HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!That post was really funny. I am trying my best to stay out of tEd Swanson-1/18/1999
452 Everyone is missing the whole point with IMON. Granted, nobody wants to pay $44Terp-1/18/1999
451 Anthony, could this be the the stock didn't move as much as it should have?xcr600-1/18/1999
450 Thank for for a rational post, hoffy. It's about time. Poet-1/18/1999
449 Currently downloading the beta. Wow, I didn't expect it until tonight. AnLouis Cornell-1/18/1999
448 I agree, let's get back to IMON and it's future. CountofMoneyCristo-1/18/1999
447 Alright, enough already; Count and Anthony. We know that the Count thinks the hoffy-1/18/1999
446 Because you spread outright lies and spurious innuendo in an effort to manipulaCountofMoneyCristo-1/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):