SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board)
An SI Board Since July 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1521 44 0 SLJB
Emcee:  jmhollen Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
471That's not too surprising, rrufff.............. Management is dam* selfish jmhollen-9/11/2006
470Hi Yass, To me, even more important is the comments that the capital structure irrufff-9/11/2006
469That works.......................... John :-) ps: Repeat -- More and easiejmhollen-9/11/2006
468The Cement Deal has not been lost according to the poster's interview 4) Cyassinzineb-9/11/2006
467here's a post from Ihub to read I don't know this guy so i 'm goingyassinzineb-9/11/2006
466Thanks Yaseen! I am in with 50K... May not be huge but for me it is... Good LucSlcnInvstr-9/11/2006
465thanks newlong - you raise some excellent posts. It will be very interesting horrufff-9/11/2006
464jmhollen & rrufff ... Does this look like a plan coming together ?? eelflnewelong2005-9/11/2006
463ATM...from whom do you think that Sue got that number?? LOL Petar asked me toangela943490-9/11/2006
462Interesting post from IHUB: IMO: At somepoint in the past, (forget when), I wasatm_prophet-9/10/2006
461ARTC.DU and EMAR.DU continue to trend higher. and both are trading at a PE of abyassinzineb-9/10/2006
460I was thinking of <i>Clarence & Mortimer Duke</i> trying to &quojmhollen-9/10/2006
459John,i don't know but something is telling me that SLJB management will takeyassinzineb-9/10/2006
458Hey <i>Mang</i>, I'm on your side. To release a PR like that Sjmhollen-9/10/2006
457John,as i said after the CEO statement I doubt the cement deal is gone. Note thayassinzineb-9/10/2006
456Well, the listing of that subject on that site is dated Sunday 10th September, 2jmhollen-9/9/2006
455Sorry if a repeat and I don't know if this is a significant news service, burrufff-9/9/2006
454SLJB is <i>"..<u>smack dab in the muddle</u>.."</jmhollen-9/8/2006
453Given the confusion with the CEO, I thought the stock would tank, but it held nirrufff-9/8/2006
452Welcome on board Slcn and on SI! IMHO it's really not too late to get in giyassinzineb-9/8/2006
451Hi Guys, I am new to this board but have been following up on SLJB on ihub. It SlcnInvstr-9/8/2006
450Being so close to the loop and considering the volume of cement required, it woujmhollen-9/8/2006
449I suspect we haven't heard the last of the $350 million deal. But it is a srrufff-9/8/2006
448exactly. if a company has $350m to spend, they will know how to deal with phonecdxx-9/8/2006
447Unfortunately, the lost deal WOULD be bad news if true. That's half of projecdxx-9/8/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):