SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ISSM
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5211 10 0 ISSM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4711 Hey guys, it's not buried yet. I've talked to Lisa Friday and Monday aDennis G.-6/16/1997
4710 Hi Cathi, >I found one part confusing (or dated?)....< I would guess thGuinnessGuy-6/16/1997
4709 I visited this site after a long time and was shocked to see that ISSM is selliBKS-6/16/1997
4708 Hi Craig: Very interesting information. What is it taken from? I found one pCathi Wierzbicki-6/16/1997
4707 Cathi: Nice article in Friday's IBD about Vitesse Semiconductor, and theirPeter van Steennis-6/15/1997
4706 Cathi: You quoted this> "It (liquid phase epitaxy) is quite an old techGuinnessGuy-6/15/1997
4705 Michael: Originally investors were told that GAD would be selling their diodesCathi Wierzbicki-6/13/1997
4704 If the GAD's diodes are so superior, why would it sell for just one buck a Michael Yang-6/13/1997
4703 Hi Keiko: I can't figure out why Yahoo linked ISSM with the Texas InstrumeCathi Wierzbicki-6/12/1997
4702 Don't know, Keiko. I saw it, too. rdrd greer-6/12/1997
4701 News ? yahoo/ quote is showing a link between T.I . and Vanguard Int Semi Keiko-6/12/1997
4700 Darrell, believe what you want, but to me it is very clear that there is much mBrander-6/12/1997
4699 Darrell: First of all, according to the company itself, the cost of productionCathi Wierzbicki-6/12/1997
4698 Brad, I do not subscribe to the "theory" that there is a major glitchCatfish-6/12/1997
4697 Cathi, Remember, Motorola is a very tough negotiater. They have been known to Catfish-6/12/1997
4696 Hi Cathi; the way I understand it, ISSM/GAD did everything but beg MOT for any Brander-6/12/1997
4695 >Remember, they turned down $2 share to sell the company 'cause they thoSONAR-6/12/1997
4694 Darrell: As I have indicated before, ISSM/GAD was willing to accept almost ANYCathi Wierzbicki-6/11/1997
4693 Henry, >that the problem was strictly business related as opposed to being aCatfish-6/11/1997
4692 Those were my conclusions as well. I realize the dollar amount is at best minishannon-6/11/1997
4691 Thanks, Craig. That explains why I couldn't find it on the internet versioCathi Wierzbicki-6/11/1997
4690 Hi Cathi, Yes, it was-if memory serves me right-in the June 2 issue on page 17.GuinnessGuy-6/11/1997
4689 Hi Craig: Can you direct us to the specific article in Globes pertaining to GACathi Wierzbicki-6/11/1997
4688 Hi Henry, Now that GAD is in receivership(according to Globes, the Israeli rag)GuinnessGuy-6/11/1997
4687 At .04 even 500,000 shares don`t amount to much ... Who knows what will come ouStep1-6/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News