SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
472 Doug F. More information on NANO shows positive upside at barrons.com It smilton-5/8/1997
471 <i> Sometimes I think this thread gets more posts than NANO gets trades. Dan McNeese-5/8/1997
470 milton, Thanks! That's part of the reason I'm sitting in NANO, SMTL, SDouglas V. Fant-5/8/1997
469 Sometimes I think this thread gets more posts than NANO gets trades. And this irustyjack-5/8/1997
468 Is today the NANO Market Maker's golf tournament? :)Peter Goss-5/8/1997
467 Doug F. I found an interesting article mentioning M/A potential for NANO. Itmilton-5/8/1997
466 Dan, Thanks. I am a Zack's subscriber, but currently they do not carry NANDouglas V. Fant-5/8/1997
465 Board, It seems Carl Johnson is looking at NANO. techstocks.com Anybody getDan McNeese-5/7/1997
464 Wade, Agreed. I have not seen a proxy form et- I'd better check my mail! IDouglas V. Fant-5/7/1997
463 dia, You are correct. I just use a very conservative cash flow + hard assets cDouglas V. Fant-5/7/1997
462 Hi Doug, I voted for the B/D, but against the proxy for dilution. I agree withWade-5/7/1997
461 Taichi, I have faith in the current B/D as they've been around along time Douglas V. Fant-5/7/1997
460 milton, Just got back from a trip- I'll have to dig around in NANO's SDouglas V. Fant-5/7/1997
459 Dale: I just read your post on NANO. Does the increase of options to 3 mill fmilton-5/6/1997
458 It does seem excessive; we lend the co. our money because we expect to be rewarstraight life-5/6/1997
457 Goug, that's interesting, How did you come up with 8.5 - $9 a share in a podia oko-5/5/1997
456 Dale, I checked the Form 14A just filed by nano to support its request for proDouglas V. Fant-5/3/1997
455 Don't think there is. Plus, the founder owns 60+ percent, so unless he goesPeter Goss-5/3/1997
454 I think that's way low, I would expect double that, $15-20/share. Does anyFollies-5/3/1997
453 dia, FWIW, I estimate a "take out" value of around $8 1/2 to $9/shaDouglas V. Fant-5/3/1997
452 Steve, This happens in shareholder derivative suits too! Sometime look at the Douglas V. Fant-5/3/1997
451 This could make a NANO customer gun shy....... on the purchase of NANO productsJohn T. Hardee-5/2/1997
450 John, Per Mr. Nolan that Lemelson did not sue NANO. Instead, Lemelson is suingWade-5/1/1997
449 Wade>>>>>>>> I sure hope you are correct about LemelsonJohn T. Hardee-5/1/1997
448 I've been following NANO since last October and bought several thousand shaKevyn Collins-Thompson-5/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News