SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NETM: Whats the BEEF?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2599 17 0 NETM
Emcee:  Steven S. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
474 No they are not on a 100% revenue increase clip any more. Does 40% make it a pWard Knutson-5/2/1996
473 NOW NOW WARD..PLEASE WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE..AFTER ALL THIS IS A PUBLIC FORUM AND olduser-5/2/1996
472 In two weeks, IDIOT, Netmanage has gone from $10 - $15. All the while you wereWard Knutson-5/2/1996
471 The following is from ZACKS PR Newswire. Netmanage going UP UP UP! Subject: NPaul Harris-5/2/1996
470 Brad, I have not bought any PTSC. JoanJoan Osland Graffius-5/2/1996
469 TJ..GOOD LIST...MY ADVICE IS STAY IN LAW SCHOOL!olduser-5/2/1996
468 EPS 0.52 x PE 30 = $15.60/share Unless you something I don't I think it&olduser-5/2/1996
467 If you don't like these posts simply don't read them!!olduser-5/2/1996
466 Hi Joan...I tend to agree with you; at this point, I think NETM is going to be Brander-5/1/1996
465 Thanks, Joan, I'll head over and check it out! Barbbarb loucks-5/1/1996
464 barb, none of us can see in the future, so don't be to hard on yourself. HaJoan Osland Graffius-5/1/1996
463 As Jim A. indicated, NETM is just taking a breather. It looked as if there wereBruce Supranowicz-5/1/1996
461 Hi Joan - I greatly respect your opinion. I got into NETM back in January aftbarb loucks-5/1/1996
460 Profit taking at the end of the day -No suprise. We may see some resistance at jim A-5/1/1996
459 Don, if you arn't going to contribute constructively to this thread I recomJoan Osland Graffius-5/1/1996
458 Brad, NETM moved above it's 50 day moving average and looks like it wan'Joan Osland Graffius-5/1/1996
457 Don, Sorry for the harsh words (it's been a long HOT day),but some of your jim A-5/1/1996
456 DON, Admitting stupidity is difficult. You should know. Your last post confirmsjim A-5/1/1996
455 BUYING NETM IS WASTE OF TIME BUSY BUYING RUDY 2 DAYS AGO @ 2.5 it's 4 todolduser-5/1/1996
454 A good jump in volume in the last 1/2 hour and stock is now at 15.25. The big jim A-5/1/1996
453 JinChing, I got out of IOMG way to early ($42), but you must sell to realize prjim A-5/1/1996
452 Jim, I can't believe Iomega either. I was thinking about shorting it. It iJinChong Wu-5/1/1996
451 JinChong, There may be some profit taking but i don't think we'll see ljim A-5/1/1996
450 I think we will see some profit-taking for the rest of the week. Look for a priJinChong Wu-5/1/1996
449 Hey Jim....I havent posted on this thread, but have been following it recently.Brander-5/1/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News