SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4764Let's see how egotistical they really are especially when they are pressuredchriscraft-1/25/2008
4763While we know that management is exceptionally well versed in writing their own James Feldman-1/25/2008
4762<<I guess we should have news on Monday if they made a payment or not?>James Feldman-1/25/2008
4761Funny!! I guess we should have news on Monday if they made a payment or not? Juchriscraft-1/25/2008
4760LOL James you are a thorough man. <G>Hal Campbell-1/25/2008
4759Hal, Don't think that Hillside's commentary at the end of one of their James Feldman-1/25/2008
4758I think the third letter is the total sum due... and I have no idea why they wouHal Campbell-1/25/2008
4757Well if thats the case, they should be able to handle that....DAMNEDIFYOUDO-1/25/2008
4756Ampx needs to pay principle of $665,000 today and pay the remaining interest of wvbuild 06-1/25/2008
4755Thanks for posting,,but which is the correct amount due???...Anyone...DAMNEDIFYOUDO-1/25/2008
4754There are three letters on the same day. I am sure there is some reason why the Hal Campbell-1/25/2008
4753Is this possible what I just read on the 8-k letters from Hillside,,that their aDAMNEDIFYOUDO-1/25/2008
4752<<I hope Hal's alternative bankruptcy prospect is viable>> Oh tHal Campbell-1/25/2008
4751Chriscraft, I disagree - you said it better than I did!OPVet-1/25/2008
4750James, Somehow you seem quite calm about this Ampex mess, even though you aOPVet-1/25/2008
4749If you read the latest 8-k from ampx, section 1.02, second paragraph...Thats whaDAMNEDIFYOUDO-1/25/2008
4748I still think its today if you read the letter, but who knows with these guys anDAMNEDIFYOUDO-1/25/2008
4747OK, but if it is business days, then Tues the 29th would be the deadline day. Onchriscraft-1/25/2008
4746We could only hope McKibbie and Strickie are that quick witted.fuddled-1/25/2008
4745LOLHal Campbell-1/25/2008
4744OT. In case you were wondering what the discussions were like between Ampex andJames Feldman-1/24/2008
4743Ampex showing up on a number of investment sites. Here's another one, from MJames Feldman-1/24/2008
4742EXACLTY!!!!!!!!! eomchriscraft-1/24/2008
4741OP I feel the same exact way and have the same thoughts and concerns, you couldnchriscraft-1/24/2008
4740every single one of the puppet managment officers should be thrown out on their wvbuild 06-1/24/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):