SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Playing the QQQQ with Terry and friends.
An SI Board Since May 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4814 93 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Gush Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4789I agree with you about the uptick rule, that it is a red herring. It is amazing Provider-5/19/2009
4788Interesting....what was the return during this time period? And how well did thiWalkingshadow-5/19/2009
4787<i><<IMHO the only thing that hasn't changed is human emotions aWalkingshadow-5/19/2009
4786Well, I think the uptick rule and the whole thing about shorts was a tempest in Walkingshadow-5/19/2009
4785Terry <i> But none of this has any direct bearing on how markets functionDon Green-5/19/2009
4784Quite good - my patience saves me every time... <img src='http://tinyurlsammy™ -_--5/18/2009
4783I think the rules have changed also, in terms of macroeconomics. It is clear thaWalkingshadow-5/18/2009
4782Terry It is absolutely different. When on that Monday morning in mid Sep, whenDon Green-5/18/2009
4781That's dicey territory, Don.....I'd be very very careful there. There Walkingshadow15/18/2009
4780<i>The main point I am trying to make is that once a bubble has formed, thDon Green-5/17/2009
4779Here's the long-term chart of the Dow after the bubble that ended in 1929. Walkingshadow-5/17/2009
4778Well, lets see: Seven sessions ago, FAS was turned away from a test of overheaWalkingshadow-5/17/2009
4777I don't find RSI to be a very useful indicator. Also, note that RSI was &qWalkingshadow-5/17/2009
4776I don't follow FAS, or the index it tracks (Russell 1000 Financial Services)Walkingshadow-5/17/2009
4775I am not at all sure the lows of 2003 will not be revisited. In fact, I think thWalkingshadow-5/17/2009
4774Here is current FAS chart, take a look and tell me where it will be in 2 weeks? stock2005-5/16/2009
4773Here is how QQQQ chart look yesterday. Look at RSI signal it is trying to move ustock2005-5/16/2009
4772Good chart and explanation, there is only one thing which need to be remember, lstock2005-5/16/2009
4771Here is the long-term chart of QQQQ, with some regression channels drawn in. TheWalkingshadow15/15/2009
4770Despite QQQQ seeming to trade bullishly for most of the session, there was a pulWalkingshadow-5/14/2009
4769Can you spell "pump-and-dump?" Obviously the big boys are trying to rWalkingshadow-5/14/2009
4768Bloomberg writer Eric Martin just reported, “For the first time since the BloombDon Green-5/14/2009
4767Volume patterns in QQQQ indicate considerable bearishness. 1. The 2 year and lWalkingshadow-5/14/2009
4766Here is another index that is a very juicy short: the Shanghai composite (SSEC).Walkingshadow-5/14/2009
4765Interesting, thanks.....although I don't entirely follow. How does this woWalkingshadow-5/14/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News