Pro Choice Action Team | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Pro Choice Action Team

An SI Board Since February 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
948	8	0

Emcee: YlangYlangBreeze	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
48	Speaking as a former fetus, I think that this thread should be aborted. Jim	J.B.C.	-	2/6/2001
47	>>Choice = a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not she wants	J.B.C.	-	2/6/2001
46	<i>but think that prohibiting it is a ruse used by those who wish to limit	Gordon A. Langston	-	2/6/2001
45	Cobalt Blue, You should be ashamed of yourself, writing not one but two posts l	Poet	-	2/6/2001
44	I hesitated to do it. But I really hate what I see here.	epicure	-	2/6/2001
43	I agree that the thread supposed to be about strategy and am also disappointed t	Poet	-	2/6/2001
42	How he feels about that has nothing to do with what this thread is supposed to b	epicure	-	2/6/2001
41	You've stated that you're pro-choice. How do you feel about the likelih	Poet	-	2/6/2001
40	Actually, I don't think Roe v. Wade is constitutionally sound, and I think i	Ilaine	-	2/6/2001
39	OK, I disobeyed <g> the thread header. Ylang Ylang Breeze made the assumpt	Tom Clarke	-	2/6/2001
38	I commend those states for not passing additional laws when existing law prevail	Bill	-	2/6/2001
37	no- what followed was you disobeying the thread header. Let's call it like i	epicure	-	2/6/2001
36	I thought I had left the building, but thanks for inviting me back. I first pos	Tom Clarke	-	2/6/2001
35	You can change it over to moderated can't you? You clearly need to.	epicure	-	2/6/2001
34	We have dealt with it. Why are you here? You would be the first of the innunda	epicure	-	2/6/2001
33	Hey YYB I am sorry for the delay in getting over here. I am ill and was put on	epicure	-	2/6/2001
32	YYB, Thank you for the invitation to the thread. I am saddened to see that des	Rambi	-	2/6/2001
31	Steve, Spin, spin, Steve, because its all you have got to work with. I don'	TH	-	2/6/2001
30	I, for one, am not comfortable with the idea of returning the issue of the legal	Mac Con Ulaidh	-	2/6/2001
29	As the header states, <i> "If and when you have resolved, for whateve	YlangYlangBreeze	-	2/6/2001
28	<i>life begins at conception. It not really a topic for debate, but it has	Dayuhan	-	2/6/2001
27	I do not debate this topic. Two observations, with no agenda. First, life begi	TH	-	2/5/2001
26	YYB, if you're going to carry the banner for the Pro Choice Action Team, I s	Ilaine	-	2/5/2001
25	I think the header is fine and I will be happy to bookmark the thread and contin	Constant Reader	-	2/5/2001
24	I <i> wanted </i> the thread header to invite participation and refl	YlangYlangBreeze	-	2/5/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):