SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LORAL -- Political Discussion
An SI Board Since May 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
880 2 0
Emcee:  Dragonfly Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
480 You are making the assertion that Clinton sold waivers. You prove it. 5 days aDragonfly-6/12/1998
479 Wrong again Dicklessfly. Bill asked you to name a company who received a waivejlallen-6/12/1998
478 You have yet to provide any reason that Hughes, Lockheed or Motorola executivesDragonfly-6/12/1998
477 <b>Ex-Official: Signs of Chinese Sale Snubbed </b> Zoltan!-6/12/1998
476 You keep changing the subject, typical. You are so dickless... you can't pDragonfly-6/12/1998
475 Not my job. You made the claim, you back it up.Dragonfly-6/12/1998
474 <i><<You are the one who said Clinton got a bigger share of the votBill-6/12/1998
473 Once again you ignore the facts. You claim that Lockheed and Hughes got waiversBill-6/12/1998
472 Did you check on the CEOs of Hughes, et al.? Did they not contribute to Clintojlallen-6/11/1998
471 Bill: Check this out! (from the Loral Thread) Message 4827131 Taking a cue jlallen-6/11/1998
470 You really are dense. You are the one who said Clinton got a bigger share ojlallen-6/11/1998
469 You thought wrong. Uh, there's no point in arguing about landslides becausDragonfly-6/11/1998
468 Only in your mind. Your evidence appears to deal only with PACs. I thought wejlallen-6/11/1998
467 <b>There you go, changing the subject.</b> My evidence is not in dDragonfly-6/11/1998
466 Did you check on the CEOs of those companies? Can you prove they did not contjlallen-6/11/1998
465 You haven't even made any specific claim, only that I'm wrong. LockheedDragonfly-6/11/1998
464 <I><<smoke from Dickless>></I> And what is your fascinBill-6/11/1998
463 Hey, fraud. Here are the facts. You claim that Lockheed and Hughes got waivers Bill-6/11/1998
462 <i>Vaughn hasn't posted a link to his sources but his point about thDragonfly-6/11/1998
461 I'll concede Mr. Vaughn hasn't posted a link to his sources but his poijlallen-6/11/1998
460 I was right! Insults and a change of the subject. Of course, no real substantDragonfly-6/11/1998
459 And what is your fascination with my anatomy? Perhaps you're not actually Bill-6/11/1998
458 OK, fraud, I'm back. Been away for a couple days living an actual life. I sBill-6/11/1998
457 B. Dickless Vaughn: <i>He cannot prove his statement and got caught red-Dragonfly-6/10/1998
456 If you are right about DF's gender, I'd say based upon the nature of hejlallen-6/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):